10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70<br />

OPPOSITION OF PROPOSITIONS.<br />

Logic on which we are now entering. Then the pro<br />

position A expresses the fact th<strong>at</strong> the thing or class<br />

<strong>of</strong> things denoted by the subject<br />

is included in and<br />

forms part <strong>of</strong> the class denoted by the predic<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

Thus (a)<br />

&quot;<br />

all metals are<br />

&quot;<br />

elements means, on this<br />

interpret<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the class &quot;metals&quot; is included in<br />

the wider class &quot;elements,&quot; and (b) &quot;all equil<strong>at</strong>eral<br />

triangles are equiangular&quot; means th<strong>at</strong> the class equi<br />

l<strong>at</strong>eral triangles is in the class equiangular triangles,<br />

and here we know also, from the m<strong>at</strong>ter <strong>of</strong> the pro<br />

position, not from its form,<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the former class is<br />

identical with the l<strong>at</strong>ter. These two possibilities always<br />

arise in an A proposition. The m<strong>at</strong>hem<strong>at</strong>ician Euler<br />

(eighteenth century) invented a method <strong>of</strong> indic<strong>at</strong>ing<br />

the extent <strong>of</strong> the denot<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a term by a circle, which<br />

is supposed to include all things denoted by the term<br />

and nothing else. In this case the proposition A is<br />

represented by one <strong>of</strong> the two :<br />

following diagrams<br />

/- \<br />

I S and P<br />

Fig. i. Fig. 2.<br />

Fig. i represents propositions <strong>of</strong> which (a) is a type,<br />

and fig. 2 those <strong>of</strong> which (b) is a type, where the classes<br />

S and P coincide. The form <strong>of</strong> this proposition does<br />

not tell us whether they coincide or not ;<br />

J<br />

it does not<br />

tell us anything <strong>of</strong> th<strong>at</strong> part <strong>of</strong> P which is outside S.<br />

But formally the proposition is always represented by<br />

its lowest case ; hence in oper<strong>at</strong>ing on an A proposi<br />

tion (e.g., in Immedi<strong>at</strong>e Inference) we always act as if<br />

fig.<br />

i represented it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!