10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 IMMEDIATE INFERENCE.<br />

contradictory <strong>of</strong> the original predic<strong>at</strong>e for its subject,<br />

and the original subject for its predic<strong>at</strong>e. In other<br />

words, we pass from a proposition <strong>of</strong> the type S P to<br />

another <strong>of</strong> the type Not-P S, to a proposition giving<br />

us direct inform<strong>at</strong>ion about Not-P.<br />

As before indic<strong>at</strong>ed, Contraposition is a compound<br />

oper<strong>at</strong>ion, involving the two simple oper<strong>at</strong>ions already<br />

described. To reach the contrapositive the rule is,<br />

first obvert the original proposition, and then convert<br />

the proposition thus obtained. The following table<br />

exhibits the steps and indic<strong>at</strong>es the result in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> the four prepositional forms :<br />

Original Proposition.<br />

A. All S is P. No S is P .<br />

E. No S is P. All S is P .<br />

Obverse.<br />

E.<br />

A.<br />

I. Some S is P. Some S is not P .<br />

O. Some S is not P. Some S is P .<br />

Converse <strong>of</strong> Obverse = Contrapositive.<br />

No P is S. E.<br />

Some P is S. I.<br />

None.<br />

Some P is S. I.<br />

O.<br />

I.<br />

If the previous real examples be taken, &quot;All men<br />

&quot;<br />

are fallible yields as its &quot;<br />

contrapositive No not-fallible<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

beings are men ; No men are perfect yields Some<br />

&quot;<br />

not-perfect beings are men ;<br />

&quot;<br />

Some men are<br />

&quot;<br />

learned<br />

yields no result, because its obverse is an O proposition<br />

and cannot be converted; &quot;Some men are not trust<br />

worthy<br />

&quot;<br />

yields<br />

&quot;<br />

Some not-trustworthy beings are men.&quot;<br />

Jevons describes this method <strong>of</strong> inference, but ap<br />

parently supposes th<strong>at</strong> it is only<br />

A proposition. But he describes<br />

applicable to the<br />

precisely the same

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!