10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AND THE ARISTOTELIAN SYLLOGISM. 125<br />

the middle term ;<br />

breach <strong>of</strong> rule i.<br />

ambiguous middle is the most common<br />

Some good examples are given by Jevons.<br />

&quot;<br />

If we argue<br />

th<strong>at</strong> all metals are elements and brass is metal, therefore it<br />

is an element, we should be using the middle term metal in<br />

two different senses, in one <strong>of</strong> which it means the pure simple<br />

substances known to chemists as metals, and in the other<br />

a mixture <strong>of</strong> metals commonly called metal in the arts, but<br />

known to chemists by the name alloy. In many examples<br />

which may be found in <strong>logic</strong>al <strong>book</strong>s the ambiguity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

middle term is exceedingly obvious, but the reader should<br />

always be prepared to meet with cases in which exceedingly<br />

subtle and difficult ambiguities occur. Thus it might be<br />

argued th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> is right should be enforced by law, and<br />

th<strong>at</strong> charity is right and should therefore be enforced by the<br />

law. Here it is evident th<strong>at</strong> right is applied in one case<br />

to wh<strong>at</strong> the conscience approves, and in another case to<br />

wh<strong>at</strong> public opinion holds to be necessary for the good <strong>of</strong><br />

We add one or two further examples <strong>of</strong><br />

&quot;<br />

ambigu<br />

society.&quot;<br />

ous middle&quot; which the student may examine for himself.<br />

&quot;All criminal actions ought to be punished by law; prose<br />

cutions for theft are criminal actions, and therefore ought to<br />

law should<br />

&quot;<br />

be punished by law (De Morgan).<br />

&quot;<br />

Every good<br />

be obeyed ; the law <strong>of</strong> gravit<strong>at</strong>ion is a good law, and there<br />

fore should be obeyed&quot; (Creighton).<br />

&quot;<br />

Partisans are not to<br />

be trusted ; the supporters <strong>of</strong> the government are partisans,<br />

and therefore are not to be trusted.&quot;<br />

For like reasons, if the subject, or the predic<strong>at</strong>e, <strong>of</strong> the<br />

conclusion is used in a different sense there from th<strong>at</strong> which<br />

it bears in its premise, the inference is invalid.<br />

The viol<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the third rule is called the fallacy <strong>of</strong><br />

undistributed middle. The rule st<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> the whole<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> the middle term must be referred to universally<br />

in one premise, if not in both. For if the middle term<br />

is not compared in its whole extent with one <strong>at</strong> least <strong>of</strong><br />

the extremes, we may be referring to one part<br />

<strong>of</strong> it in<br />

one premise, and quite another part <strong>of</strong> it in the other ;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!