10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 THE GENERAL AIM OF LOGIC.<br />

&quot;c<strong>at</strong>egorem<strong>at</strong>ic,&quot; from the Greek Kcn-nyoptw, I predic<strong>at</strong>e. A<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

sync<strong>at</strong>egorem<strong>at</strong>ic word may become a term in a propo<br />

&quot;<br />

sition which makes some st<strong>at</strong>ement about its use as a part<br />

&quot; When is an adverb, and sometimes a<br />

&quot;<br />

<strong>of</strong> : speech e.g.)<br />

conjunction also.&quot;<br />

The student must remember th<strong>at</strong> there is no separ<strong>at</strong>e<br />

existence in thought (no third idea coming between the<br />

subject and predic<strong>at</strong>e) corresponding to the separ<strong>at</strong>e exist<br />

ence <strong>of</strong> the copula in the typical proposition, S is P.<br />

7. Judgments may be combined into reasonings or<br />

inferences. Wh<strong>at</strong> is an inference? To infer is to<br />

arrive <strong>at</strong> a truth not directly through experience, but<br />

as a consequence <strong>of</strong> some truth, or truths already<br />

known ; as when I see a circle <strong>of</strong> stones, and infer th<strong>at</strong><br />

they were arranged by human hands ;<br />

or when I believe<br />

th<strong>at</strong> nothing proceeding from a pure moral intention<br />

can be utterly condemned, and th<strong>at</strong> some devi<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

from the common rules <strong>of</strong> morality have proceeded<br />

from this source, and accordingly infer th<strong>at</strong> those de<br />

vi<strong>at</strong>ions are not to be altogether condemned. J. S. Mill<br />

&quot;<br />

defines inference thus : We start from known truths to<br />

arrive <strong>at</strong> others really distinct from them.&quot; The truths<br />

from which we start are the premises, th<strong>at</strong> which we<br />

reach is the conclusion. Both Mill and Wh<strong>at</strong>ely point<br />

out th<strong>at</strong> the chief work <strong>of</strong> practical life is concerned<br />

&quot;<br />

with drawing inferences<br />

&quot;<br />

in this sense.<br />

Hence we have three main divisions <strong>of</strong> Logic<br />

on to th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

I. The doctrine <strong>of</strong> Terms, leading<br />

&quot;ideas,&quot; the element in the Judgment to<br />

which the Term corresponds.<br />

II. The doctrine <strong>of</strong> the Judgment.<br />

III. The doctrine <strong>of</strong> Inferential Thought.<br />

8. We have seen th<strong>at</strong> Ideas are not prior to Judg<br />

ments ; for a Judgment is not built up by putting<br />

separ<strong>at</strong>e Ideas together. Ideas are distinguishable

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!