10.04.2013 Views

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

An introductory text-book of logic - Mellone, Sydney - Rare Books at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OPPOSITION OF PROPOSITIONS. 73<br />

by fig. 4. (b) P may be a narrower class than S, and<br />

fall entirely within it :<br />

&quot; Some Europeans are not<br />

Frenchmen,&quot; represented by fig. 5. Although any<br />

actual instance <strong>of</strong> an O proposition will be <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

type as one <strong>of</strong> these examples (a) or (), the mere form<br />

<strong>of</strong> the O proposition does not exclude fig. 3.<br />

We see, therefore, th<strong>at</strong> the proposition O, like E, tells<br />

something <strong>of</strong> the whole predic<strong>at</strong>e ;<br />

&quot;<br />

for if some<br />

S<br />

&quot;<br />

falls<br />

wholly outside P, P must fall wholly outside th<strong>at</strong> part<br />

<strong>at</strong> least <strong>of</strong> S.<br />

6. A term is said to be distributed, when we know<br />

merely from the form <strong>of</strong> the proposition in which it<br />

occurs th<strong>at</strong> it is applicable to every individual <strong>of</strong> the<br />

class. Which terms, then, are known to be distributed<br />

in the four propositional forms ?<br />

(1) In A, the subject is distributed,<br />

as the &quot;all&quot;<br />

tells us. But we do not know whether the predic<strong>at</strong>e is<br />

taken in its whole extent (as in 5, fig. 2), or only in<br />

part<br />

<strong>of</strong> it<br />

tributed. 1<br />

(fig. i); hence the predic<strong>at</strong>e<br />

is not dis<br />

(2) In E, both subject and predic<strong>at</strong>e are known to<br />

be distributed, for the proposition tells us ( 5, fig. 3)<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the whole <strong>of</strong> S is outside P, and therefore the<br />

whole <strong>of</strong> P must be outside S.<br />

(3) In I, the subject is not known to be distributed<br />

as the word &quot;some&quot; tells us; and the predic<strong>at</strong>e is not,<br />

for the proposition does not tell us whether it is taken<br />

in its whole extent (fig. 5) or in part only (fig. 4).<br />

(4) In O the subject is not known to be distributed ;<br />

but the predic<strong>at</strong>e is so, for, as we saw ( 5 ad finem\<br />

the proposition tells us th<strong>at</strong> the whole <strong>of</strong> P must fall<br />

1 The word &quot;distributed&quot; is always nothing but an abbrevi<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the phrase &quot;known from the form <strong>of</strong> the proposition to be dis<br />

tributed.&quot;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!