28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FROM JEHOSHAPHAT TO AHAZ. There is no information<br />

about Edom from the end of Solomon’s reign until Jehoshaphat’s,<br />

either from the Bible or from other sources. It<br />

may be assumed that after the collapse of Solomon’s kingdom<br />

and its division, and especially after Shishak’s campaign in<br />

Judah and Israel, Edom finally overthrew the yoke of Israel’s<br />

rule and established an independent kingdom, which lasted<br />

around 50 years, until the time of Jehoshaphat. With the expansion<br />

of Judah southward in the time of Jehoshaphat, the<br />

submission of the Arabian tribes (II Chron. 17:11), and the institution<br />

of a mercantile fleet at Ezion-Geber (I Kings 22:49),<br />

Edom was probably conquered. <strong>In</strong> fact, there is an explicit<br />

statement in this regard from which it can be understood that<br />

not only was Edom conquered by Jehoshaphat but he dealt<br />

with it as did David and turned it into a province ruled by<br />

governors. Chronicles writes in connection with Jehoshaphat<br />

that “there was no king in Edom; a deputy was king” (I Kings<br />

22:48 (47)). The conquest of Edom probably stemmed from<br />

the same economic motivations which existed at the time of<br />

David and Solomon. Edom became subject to Judah, and,<br />

during the period of subjection, “the king of Edom” (probably<br />

the “deputy” mentioned above) joined the campaign of<br />

Joram king of Israel and Jehoshaphat king of Judah against<br />

Mesha, the rebellious king of Moab, which passed “through<br />

the wilderness of Edom” (II Kings 3:8). The participation of<br />

the “king of Edom” angered the king of Moab, who attempted<br />

first and foremost “to break through opposite the king of<br />

Edom” (3:26). The failure of this campaign led to the weakening<br />

of the rule of Judah and Israel in eastern Transjordan,<br />

as well as Judah’s rule in Edom. It is explicitly stated that during<br />

the time of Joram, Edom rebelled against Judah: “<strong>In</strong> his<br />

days Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah, and made<br />

a king over themselves” (II Kings 8:20). Joram attempted at<br />

the beginning of his reign (probably in 848 B.C.E.) to reinstate<br />

Israel’s hegemony over Edom in a great campaign including<br />

“all the chariots” (8:21–22), which apparently failed (the biblical<br />

text is corrupt here), and Edom was completely liberated<br />

from the domination of Judah. Edom maintained its independence<br />

for about 60 years, until the middle of Amaziah’s reign.<br />

At the time of Amaziah, Judah recovered from the pressure of<br />

Aram, to which it paid heavy taxes. This recovery is expressed<br />

in the undertaking of a military campaign against Edom in<br />

order to renew the rule of Israel there. It is said of Amaziah<br />

that “He slew of Edom in the Valley of Salt 10,000, and took<br />

Sela by war, and called the name of it Joktheel unto this day”<br />

(II Kings 14:7). The battle was waged in northern Edom, the<br />

Valley of Salt (as in David’s time), and in Sela. Amaziah (like<br />

Joab) treated the Edomites with cruelty, as is recounted in<br />

II Chronicles 25:11–12: “…and [Amaziah] smote 10,000 men<br />

of Seir. The men of Judah captured another 10,000 alive and<br />

took them to the top of a rock and threw them down from the<br />

top of the rock; and they were all dashed to pieces.” It seems<br />

that the changing of Sela’s name can be interpreted not only<br />

as a symbol of renewed domination but perhaps also as the<br />

introduction of Judahite settlers in the new important town<br />

edom<br />

Joktheel which “on account of its geographic conditions, its<br />

distinctly strategic location, its close proximity to the capital<br />

Bozrah which lay south of it, and its control over the approach<br />

to the mines of the Arabah, … was subject to a violent controversy<br />

between Israel and Edom” (S. Abramsky). With the conquest<br />

of Sela, Amaziah assured Judah of control over northern<br />

Edom and the copper mines of the Punon area. It appears<br />

that Uzziah son of Amaziah completed his father’s activity by<br />

conquering Edom. Uzziah, who expanded his kingdom in the<br />

direction of south and the Negev, “built Elath and restored it<br />

to Judah” (II Kings 14:22); this was the climax of his activity<br />

in the Negev and the Arabah, in developing agriculture, industry,<br />

and commerce, which has been confirmed by archaeological<br />

excavations and surveys. Apparently, in the days of<br />

Jotham son of Uzziah as well, Judah ruled over Edom. The<br />

“םתיל” (lytm) seal found at Ezion-Geber may have belonged<br />

to Jotham. This period of Judah’s rule over Edom did not last<br />

long, and ended with the establishment of the Aramean-Israelite<br />

coalition between Rezin king of Aram and Pekah king<br />

of Israel: “At that time the king of Edom recovered Elath for<br />

Edom (the MT text reads Aram instead of Edom) and drove<br />

the men of Judah from Elath; and the Edomites came to Elath,<br />

where they dwell to this day” (II Kings 16:6). The Edomites<br />

took the opportunity to penetrate Judah itself: “For again the<br />

Edomites had come and smitten Judah, and carried away captives”<br />

(II Chron. 28:17). There was probably a final attempt on<br />

the part of Judah, during the time of Hezekiah, to renew its<br />

hegemony over Edom. <strong>In</strong> the genealogical list of Simeon’s descendants,<br />

it is stated parenthetically that “some of them, 500<br />

men of the Simeonites, went to Mount Seir … and they destroyed<br />

the remnant of the Amalekites that had escaped, and<br />

they have dwelt there to this day” (I Chron. 4:42–43). This<br />

attempt, however, was probably limited to the western border<br />

district of Edom and had no real results since Edom, like<br />

Judah, was subjugated by Assyria.<br />

FROM AHAZ UNTIL THE DESTRUCTION OF JUDAH. From<br />

the time of Ahaz, Edom became an Assyrian vassal state,<br />

like the other nations of Palestine and Syria. Tiglath-Pileser<br />

III (745–727 B.C.E.) mentions, together with the kings of<br />

Palestine and Syria, Qosmalaku, king of Edom, who surrendered<br />

to him (Pritchard, Texts, 282). Sennacherib mentions<br />

the king of Edom, Aiarammu (ibid., 287), who surrendered<br />

to him in his campaign against Jerusalem (701 B.C.E.). Esarhaddon<br />

(680–669 B.C.E.) mentions Qosgabri king of Edom<br />

together with the 22 vassal kings whom he swore to loyalty at<br />

Nineveh (ibid., 291). <strong>In</strong> addition to its subjugation to Assyria,<br />

Edom was, beginning with the eighth century B.C.E., under<br />

pressure from the Arabian tribes that impoverished the land<br />

and brought about its decline in material culture. Toward the<br />

end of the kingdom of Judah (beginning of the sixth century<br />

B.C.E.), when Judah was rising up against Babylonian<br />

rule, Edom was among the peoples preparing to rebel against<br />

the Babylonian king. The king of Edom sent messengers to<br />

a meeting of rebels called in Jerusalem by Zedekiah king of<br />

ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6 155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!