28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

emden<br />

it is valid, because a person is favorably disposed toward his<br />

own child and wholeheartedly wishes to transfer ownership<br />

to him (Sh. Ar., ḥM 253:26–27). Some are of the opinion that<br />

this law applies only to a will made by a person on his deathbed<br />

and not to one made by a healthy person (Beit Yosef to<br />

Tur, ḥM 210:3; Sh. Ar., ḥM 210:1).<br />

Contractual Obligations to an Embryo<br />

According to some authorities although transfer of rights<br />

cannot be made to an embryo, a contractual obligation can<br />

be undertaken in his favor (see *Contract). A guardian can<br />

be appointed to protect the rights of an embryo (Sh. Ar., ḥm<br />

290:1).<br />

The State of Israel<br />

<strong>In</strong> general, Jewish law is followed. With regard to succession,<br />

however, section 3 of the law of succession (1965) provides that<br />

a person born within 300 days after the death of the deceased is<br />

deemed to have been living when the deceased died, unless it is<br />

proved that he was conceived thereafter. <strong>In</strong> terms of section 33<br />

(b) of the Capacity and Guardianship Law, 5722–1962, the court<br />

may appoint a guardian for a child en ventre de sa mére.<br />

Bibliography: Gulak, Yesodei, 1 (1922), 33; 3 (1922), 82, 116,<br />

147; ET, 7 (1956), 50–53; 8 (1957), 102–20; 11 (1965), 255f.; Miklishanski,<br />

in: Sefer ha-Yovel… Federbush (1960), 251–60; G. Ellinson, in: Sinai,<br />

66 (1969/70), 20–49; Elon, Ha-Mishpat Ha-Ivri (1988), I, 496; idem.<br />

Jewish Law (1994), II, 604.<br />

[Ben-Zion (Benno) Schereschewsky]<br />

EMDEN, city in Germany. The first authentic reference to<br />

Jews in Emden dates from the first half of the 16th century.<br />

David *Gans mentions Jews of Emden in his Ẓemaḥ David.<br />

A Jewish cemetery is mentioned in 1586. <strong>In</strong> 1590 the citizens<br />

of Emden complained to the representative of the emperor<br />

that the Jews were permitted to follow their religious precepts<br />

openly and were exempted from wearing the Jewish *badge.<br />

Marranos from Portugal passed through Emden on their<br />

way to Amsterdam, and a few settled in Emden and returned<br />

to Judaism. Moses Uri ha-Levy (1594–1620), a former rabbi<br />

of Emden who settled in Amsterdam, officiated there as the<br />

first ḥakham of the Portuguese community. The city council<br />

of Emden discriminated between the local Jews and the Portuguese,<br />

encouraging the latter to settle in the city, while attempting<br />

to expel the former. Their attempts, however, were<br />

unsuccessful, since the duke intervened in their favor. The<br />

judicial rights of the Portuguese Jews were defined in a grant<br />

of privilege issued by the city council in 1649, and renewed<br />

in 1703. <strong>In</strong> 1744, when Emden was annexed to *Prussia, the<br />

Jews there came under Prussian law. <strong>In</strong> 1762 there was an outbreak<br />

of anti-Jewish riots in Emden. <strong>In</strong> 1808, during the rule of<br />

Louis Bonaparte, the Jews in Emden were granted equal civic<br />

rights. There were then 500 Jews living in Emden. The rights<br />

of the Emden Jews were abolished under Hanoverian rule in<br />

1815, and they did not obtain emancipation until 1842. Noted<br />

rabbis of Emden were Jacob *Emden (1728–33), and Samson<br />

Raphael *Hirsch (1841–47).<br />

The community numbered 900 in 1905, and 1,000 in<br />

1930. Nearly half left with the advent of Nazi rule and another<br />

quarter through 1938. The synagogue was burned down on<br />

Kristallnacht and most of those remaining were later deported<br />

and perished, including at least 150 on October 23, 1941. Community<br />

life was not resumed after the Holocaust.<br />

Bibliography: Lewin, in: MGWJ, 2 (1890), 27–32; H. Kellenbenz,<br />

Sephardim an der unteren Elbe (1958), index; M. Markreich, in:<br />

Jahrbuch der juedischen Gemeinden Schleswig-Holsteins, 5 (1933/34),<br />

24–36; PK Germanyah; Germ Jud, 2 (1968), 208–9; A. Cassuto, in:<br />

Juedische Familien-Forschung, 2 (1926), 289. Add. Bibliography:<br />

J. Lokers, Die Juden in Emden 1530–1906 (1990); M. Claudi, Die wir<br />

verloren haben. Lebensgeschichten Emder Juden (1991); M. Studemund-Halévy,<br />

in: Aschkenas, 7 (1997), 389–439.<br />

[Zvi Avneri]<br />

EMDEN, JACOB (pen name Yaveẓ; derived from Ya’akov<br />

Ben Ẓevi; 1697–1776), rabbi, halakhic authority, kabbalist,<br />

and anti-Shabbatean polemicist. Emden was regarded as one<br />

of the outstanding scholars of his generation. Emden’s teacher<br />

was his father Ẓevi Hirsch *Ashkenazi (Ḥakham Ẓevi). He inherited<br />

his father’s interest in secular studies, his dissociation<br />

from the Ashkenazi method of study (pilpul) and customs, his<br />

stormy, independent, and uncompromising character, and his<br />

devotion to the campaign against the Shabbateans and their<br />

sympathizers. <strong>In</strong> addition, he possessed a fine literary talent,<br />

a critical tendency, and a knowledge unusual for his age of<br />

general non-halakhic Jewish literature. He was also familiar<br />

with sciences and languages (German, Dutch, Latin). Despite<br />

his distinguished descent and his remarkable talmudic attainments,<br />

Emden occupied no official position, with the exception<br />

of a few years as rabbi of Emden (1728–33). This made it<br />

possible for him to be exceptionally critical toward the society<br />

and the tradition of his time. He was more on guard about<br />

anything that he considered ḥillul ha-Shem (bringing the name<br />

of the Jew into disrepute) than for the good name of the rabbinate<br />

and of the community. He made extensive use of the<br />

private printing press he founded in *Altona to disseminate<br />

his views. As a result, because of his views on a number of issues,<br />

both personal and communal, he became a figure of contention.<br />

His important halakhic works are Leḥem Shamayim,<br />

on the Mishnah (pt. 1, 1728; pt. 2, 1768); a letter of criticism<br />

against R. Ezekiel Katzenellenbogen, rabbi of Altona (1736);<br />

responsa, She’elat Yaveẓ (2 pts., 1738–59); Mor u-Keẓi’ah, on the<br />

Shulḥan Arukh, OḤ (2 pts., 1761–68). <strong>In</strong> addition, he published<br />

an important edition of the prayer book (whose parts had different<br />

names) with a valuable commentary (1745–48). This<br />

prayer book was reprinted several times. His main historical<br />

importance lies in his campaigns against the Shabbateans<br />

to which he dedicated many years. He relentlessly examined<br />

and investigated every suspicious phenomenon pertaining<br />

to the sect. He called upon the contemporary rabbis to publish<br />

excommunications and mercilessly attacked anyone suspected<br />

of supporting or showing sympathy to the Shabbateans.<br />

The Shabbateans were accustomed to introduce hints of<br />

their secret doctrine into their literary works, particularly in<br />

392 ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!