28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

French demands imposed upon Switzerland (1797) to exempt<br />

French Jews visiting the country from special customs duties<br />

and taxes. The Helvetic Republic, established in 1798, passed<br />

general resolutions on emancipation. Special taxes on Jews<br />

were abrogated on July 1, 1798, as “a disgrace to the honor of<br />

mankind.” This problem only concerned *Aargau, the one canton<br />

in which Jews were living legally. Full emancipation was<br />

rejected in 1799. The constitution of 1848 declared the theoretical<br />

equality of all Swiss citizens (art. 4), but, in effect, reserved<br />

full rights of citizenship only for members of one of the<br />

recognized Christian churches (art. 41). <strong>In</strong> 1856 the National<br />

Council decided that Jews living in the cantons permanently<br />

were to benefit from civic and political rights in their places<br />

of residence, and guaranteed their right to move freely within<br />

Switzerland. These resolutions, however, met with strong opposition<br />

from both the public and the authorities of Aargau.<br />

Only on Aug. 27, 1863, was the vote granted to the Jews of<br />

Canton Aargau. The emancipation of Switzerland’s Jews concluded<br />

as it had begun by pressure from the outside. Many<br />

countries (France, the Netherlands, the U.S.A.) requested that<br />

Switzerland not discriminate against their Jewish citizens visiting<br />

there. Threats to cancel commercial treaties were made<br />

by France in 1835 and 1864, and the Netherlands in 1863, if the<br />

rights of their Jewish citizens were not guaranteed. Switzerland’s<br />

consent to such demands created the anomaly of giving<br />

preference to Jews of other countries over Jews of Swiss nationality,<br />

which strengthened the case of those who demanded<br />

full emancipation. On Jan. 14, 1866, all restrictions concerning<br />

the right of Jews to establish residence were abolished, and on<br />

April 19, 1874, article 49 of the new constitution declared full<br />

emancipation in Switzerland.<br />

THE BALKANS. <strong>In</strong> the Balkan countries (*Greece, *Bulgaria,<br />

*Serbia, and *Romania), which gained their independence<br />

from the *Ottoman Empire with the support of Russia,<br />

the question of the status of Jews was raised as soon as each<br />

country became independent. The Jews were generally loyal<br />

to *Turkey. The Christian insurgents were imbued with religious<br />

fanaticism, and Russia’s hostility toward the Jews was<br />

notorious.<br />

The question of Jewish emancipation became connected<br />

with the fate of Muslim minorities. From the time of establishment<br />

of the Balkan countries, these factors brought about the<br />

intervention of the great powers to help determine the status<br />

of minorities. <strong>In</strong> the protocol of the Conference of London<br />

(Nov. 30, 1830), which recognized the independence of Greece,<br />

the powers agreed that “all the subjects of the new state, without<br />

distinction of religion, shall be eligible for appointment<br />

in public service, government, and honorary positions, and<br />

their treatment should be based on complete equality in all<br />

religious, civic and political matters.”<br />

<strong>In</strong> the irade (a decree on governmental organization),<br />

which the sultan gave to Serbia on Dec. 24, 1838, the obligation<br />

of the government to “protect the property, the freedom, and<br />

the honor” of all the inhabitants was emphasized. After the<br />

emancipation<br />

Crimean War, the protocol of the Council of Constantinople<br />

(Feb. 11, 1856) declared that in the principalities of the Danube<br />

(Moldavia and Wallachia, which by their union formed<br />

the Kingdom of Romania) “freedom would be given to all<br />

the members of the various religions, and all of them, without<br />

distinction of religion, would be accorded the protection<br />

of the law, would be eligible for employment in the service of<br />

the public and society, and would be authorized to acquire<br />

lands and real estate.” The Treaty of Paris (Aug. 19, 1858), however,<br />

stated in article 46 that “those belonging to the Christian<br />

Churches would benefit from political equality, while the extension<br />

of political rights to other elements of the population<br />

was the concern of the legislature.” Agreeing in principle with<br />

the non-equality practiced in Serbia and Romania, the article<br />

continued to be the source of discrimination and expulsions<br />

(in Serbia, 1856 and 1869; in Romania, 1867–70, etc.), and even<br />

riots (in Romania, 1866–68).<br />

It was only in Greece that emancipation gradually materialized<br />

(1870–72) without any additional outside pressure.<br />

<strong>In</strong> the other Balkan countries, emancipation was guaranteed<br />

by the Congress of Berlin, where, as a result of the numerous<br />

intercessions of the Alliance Israélite Universelle, it was decided<br />

that special articles on equality in Bulgaria, Serbia, and<br />

Romania would be a condition for international recognition<br />

of their independence. The article on Bulgaria declared that<br />

“no person should be deprived of his civic or political rights<br />

because of his religious beliefs,” and that “all the inhabitants<br />

of the Bulgarian Principality, without distinction of religion<br />

or race, may be accepted into every public office, government<br />

service, and honorary position.” With respect to Serbia, the<br />

Congress decided to consent to Serbian independence on the<br />

condition that religious freedom be recognized. The kingdoms<br />

of Bulgaria and Serbia included the articles on emancipation<br />

in their constitutions.<br />

ROMANIA. The situation developed differently in Romania.<br />

Article 44, ratified at the Congress of Berlin, dealt with emancipation<br />

in Romania, and although not explicitly mentioning<br />

the Jews, reflected an understanding of their oppressed position<br />

in that country and was directed toward ameliorating<br />

it. The article declared “the differences between the religious<br />

faiths, or the credo of any person, cannot serve as a pretext<br />

for exclusion from the society which enjoys civic and political<br />

rights, or from certain professions, categories of crafts or<br />

industry, in any place.” “Freedom of worship,” the article continued,<br />

“shall be guaranteed to members of all religions in Romania,<br />

as well as to all foreigners, and no obstacles shall be<br />

laid in the way of the hierarchic organization of the various<br />

communities or their relations with their spiritual leaders.<br />

The treatment of the subjects of all the powers, businessmen,<br />

or others, when in Romania, shall be on the basis of complete<br />

equality.” <strong>In</strong> actual practice, the Romanian government found<br />

a way to nullify this article. Although formally drafting the<br />

seventh article of its constitution according to the demands of<br />

the Congress of Berlin (the difference in religions and faiths in<br />

ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6 381

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!