28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

on a smaller scale, and the dispersal of the population was followed<br />

by a regrouping in new communities in the evacuation<br />

areas. The countryside and small towns, which had hardly<br />

known a Jew, became the homes of thriving communities for<br />

the duration of the war, and some of these new communities<br />

maintained their existence even after the war. The main effect<br />

of the war on the distribution of the Jewish population, however,<br />

is seen in the East End of London and in some of the<br />

other Jewish quarters in the main provincial cities, where the<br />

bombing destroyed the physical environment. The Ashkenazi<br />

Great Synagogue in Duke’s Place, London, was only one of the<br />

Jewish monuments and institutions that was lost. <strong>In</strong> the East<br />

End of London, the old Jewish residential area was never rebuilt<br />

though some of the older people remained or returned<br />

and many others continued to come in daily to work.<br />

ENGLAND AND PALESTINE. The relations of the developing<br />

Jewish community in Palestine with the British government<br />

as a mandatory power increasingly concerned the Anglo-Jewish<br />

community, which expressed opposition to the policy set<br />

down in the White Paper of 1939, limiting Jewish immigration<br />

to Palestine. Support for a Jewish state was the policy of<br />

the Zionist bodies and the *World Jewish Congress, but not<br />

of the *Anglo-Jewish Association nor of its splinter group,<br />

the anti-Zionist Jewish Fellowship, headed by Sir Basil *Henriques<br />

(which dissolved in 1948). The Anglo-Jewish Association<br />

enjoyed great prestige for its distinguished membership<br />

and 70 years of concern with foreign affairs. The wish to mobilize<br />

the support in the representative body of Anglo-Jewry<br />

for Zionist policies was combined with a desire to make its<br />

leadership reflect the changing character of the community<br />

as a whole. These aspirations were symbolized by the 1939<br />

election of Selig *Brodetsky, a first generation Russo-Jewish<br />

immigrant, educated in Britain, as president of the Board of<br />

Deputies. They were realized in 1943 by a carefully planned<br />

campaign to secure the election to the board of a majority<br />

committed to the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine. The<br />

newly elected board dissolved its joint Foreign Committee<br />

with the Anglo-Jewish Association. As in World War I, the<br />

problems of Palestine effected a polarization in the Anglo-Jewish<br />

community between those who put primary emphasis on<br />

Jewish national ideals and those who stressed the overriding<br />

claims of British citizenship.<br />

Although this dichotomy was unrealistic in many respects,<br />

it sharpened communal tensions. After the creation<br />

of the State of Israel, the Anglo-Jewish Association adopted a<br />

policy of goodwill toward the new state, but stressed the responsibilities<br />

of Anglo-Jews as citizens of Britain who were<br />

identified with its national life. Communal tensions were also<br />

heightened by some antisemitism, which resulted from the<br />

conflict between the mandatory administration and the yishuv,<br />

beginning with the assassination of Lord Moyne in 1944<br />

and culminating in the hanging of two British army sergeants<br />

in August 1947. The latter was followed by minor disorders in<br />

some provincial cities and some attacks on Jewish property.<br />

england<br />

Normalcy was restored after the establishment of diplomatic<br />

relations between the British government and the new state.<br />

EDUCATION. The need to provide for the education of children<br />

dispersed in the 1939–45 evacuation led to the formation<br />

of a joint emergency organization. <strong>In</strong> 1945 Jewish education<br />

was substantially reorganized on this basis with a central<br />

council for the whole country and an executive board for<br />

London, representing the United Synagogue and other Orthodox<br />

institutions. Jewish education during the evacuation<br />

had been limited to an average of one hour a week, and improvement<br />

of standards after the war was slow. The new organization<br />

was responsible for the reconstitution of the Jews’<br />

Free School and two other of the prewar private schools that<br />

were closed during the war, one of which was a secondary<br />

comprehensive school in a central location with a planned<br />

complement of 1,500 pupils. As Jewish education regained<br />

importance, the schools took various forms: the Jewish secondary<br />

schools movement, begun in 1929 by Victor Schonfeld;<br />

the day schools begun in the 1950s under Zionist auspices; independent<br />

Orthodox day schools with Yiddish as a language<br />

of instruction; the long-standing provincial day schools; and<br />

Carmel College, a private school in the country, founded by<br />

Kopul Rosen.<br />

Early Postwar Period<br />

Chief Rabbi Hertz died in January 1946 and Israel *Brodie succeeded<br />

him in May 1948. The first chief rabbi to be both born<br />

and educated in Britain, Brodie found the religious spectrum<br />

of Anglo-Jewry not only growing stronger at either end but<br />

also tending to disintegrate in the middle. Orthodoxy, combining<br />

strict observance and exact learning with secular culture,<br />

had been strengthened by the Central European refugees<br />

of the Frankfurt school and, particularly after 1945, was<br />

also increased by refugees from Poland and Hungary, many of<br />

whom were Ḥasidim. The Reform and Liberal congregations,<br />

while still a minority, probably increased their membership<br />

at a greater rate than the United Synagogue, opening numerous<br />

new congregations and founding the Leo Baeck College<br />

to train their own ministers. Although their leadership was<br />

clearly strengthened by the Central European immigration of<br />

1933–39, much of their postwar membership could only have<br />

come from the ranks of the nominally Orthodox. The Spanish<br />

and Portuguese Congregation also increased with the immigration<br />

of Jews from Egypt, Iraq, and Aden.<br />

<strong>In</strong> 1956, Anglo-Jewry celebrated the tercentenary of the<br />

resettlement, with a more or less united service at the historic<br />

Bevis Marks Synagogue and a dinner at London’s Guildhall,<br />

in the presence of the Duke of Edinburgh. But the sentiments<br />

of communal solidarity – and of self-congratulation<br />

on communal self-discipline – engendered by these celebrations<br />

were short-lived. There had already been considerable<br />

changes within the main synagogal bodies. The character of<br />

the Federation of Synagogues changed as its membership,<br />

while hardly increasing, moved from the small ḥevrot of the<br />

ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6 419

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!