28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ecclesiastes rabbah<br />

tices but insists that God is just. Qohelet does not eliminate<br />

this contradiction but is just frustrated by it.<br />

God for Qohelet is an absolute, unpredictable autocrat.<br />

He is a distant and all-powerful force who can be feared but<br />

not loved (3:14b; 5:1, 2, 4; 6). But, though rather steely and remote,<br />

He is not uniformly hostile. If (for unpredictable reasons)<br />

God should grant someone good things, He wants the<br />

fortunate man to enjoy these gifts (5:20; 9:7).<br />

For all his complaints, Qohelet is not a nihilist. “Everything<br />

is absurd” is to be understood as expressing a general<br />

characterization of life, not an absolute negation of the value<br />

of all activities and values. Qohelet shows how humans can<br />

recover and reconstruct meanings. He does not arrive at a<br />

grand logic or theology that makes sense of everything, but<br />

he does recommend modest adjustments and small-scale accommodations<br />

in our individual lives.<br />

Some things Qohelet does find worthwhile, such as moderate<br />

work, temperate enjoyment of the pleasures that come<br />

to hand, love and friendship, gaining and using whatever wisdom<br />

is within our capacity, being reasonably righteous, and<br />

fearing God. Though their benefits are brief, imperfect, and<br />

uncertain, they are enough to make life worth living. Qohelet<br />

comes to realize that despite all its unfairness and absurdity,<br />

life itself is good, to be grasped all the more eagerly for<br />

death’s finality.<br />

Qohelet’s affirmations all look inward, to each individual’s<br />

benefit, and his concerns are internal as well: what troubles<br />

people, what cheers them up, how they can get along in a<br />

world in which much is predetermined and opaque. Though<br />

there are practical things we can do to reduce the risks, the<br />

only real realm of real freedom and control is the human<br />

heart – the domain of emotions, thoughts, and attitudes.<br />

We are to enjoy whatever pleasures God makes possible and<br />

avoid whatever sorrow we can. This, we may note, is Stoic<br />

doctrine as well.<br />

A different theology emerges in the epilogue, 12:9–14.<br />

This is commonly considered an addition by a later scribe,<br />

but it may well be the words of the anonymous author. The<br />

epilogue evaluates Qohelet from a more conventional standpoint.<br />

It assures the reader that Qohelet was a wise and eloquent<br />

teacher, but also warns that the words of the wise hold<br />

certain dangers. What is of ultimate importance is to fear<br />

God, obey His commandments, and live in awareness of His<br />

ultimate judgment.<br />

Bibliography: EARLY COMMENTARIES: MIDRASH QOHE-<br />

LET RABBA 8th–10th C. B.C.E.; ENGLISH TRANS. A. Cohen, Midrash<br />

Rabbah, 8 (1983); Saadiah Gaon; Rashi; Abraham Ibn Ezra; Samuel b.<br />

Meir; Samuel ibn Tibbon; Obadiah b. Jacob Sforno; Yosef Ibn Yaḥyah;<br />

Moshe b. Hayyim Alsheikh. MODERN COMMENTARIES: G.A. Barton<br />

(ICC, 1908); C.D. Ginsburg (1861; with extensive survey of older literature);<br />

E. Podechard (Fr., 1912); H.W. Hertzberg (Ger., 1932, 19632 ); R.<br />

Gordis (1951, 19673 ); H.L. Ginsberg (Heb., 1961); J.L. Crenshaw (OTL,<br />

1987); R.L. Murphy (WBC, 1992); M.V. Fox (JPS Commentary, 2004);<br />

C.L. Seow (AB, 1997); T. Longman III (NICOT, 1998); N. Lohfink<br />

(Continental Commentaries, 2003). STUDIES: H.L. Ginsberg, Studies<br />

in Kohelet (1950); E. Bickerman, Four Strange Books of the Bible (1967),<br />

139–67. Add. Bibliography: A. Schoors, The Preacher Sought to<br />

Find Pleasing Words (1992); idem, Qohelet in the Context of <strong>Wisdom</strong><br />

(1997); M.V. Fox, A Time to Tear Down and a Time to Build Up (1999);<br />

D.C. Fredericks, Coping With Transcience (1993); E. Christianson, A<br />

Time to Tell: Narrative Strategies in Qoheleth (1998); S. Burkes, Death<br />

in Qoheleth (1999); R. Sandberg, Rabbinic Views of Qohelet (1999); D.<br />

Rudman, Determinism in the Book of Ecclesiastes (2001).<br />

[Harold Louis Ginsberg / Michael v. Fox (2nd ed.)]<br />

ECCLESIASTES RABBAH (Heb. הָ ּבַ ר תֶלֶהֹק, Kohelet Rabbah),<br />

*aggadic Midrash on the book of *Ecclesiastes, called<br />

“Midrash Kohelet” in the editio princeps. (On the term “Rabbah,”<br />

see Ruth *Rabbah.)<br />

The Structure<br />

Eccelesiastes Rabbah is an exegetical Midrash which gives a<br />

chapter by chapter and verse by verse exposition of the Book<br />

of Ecclesiastes. <strong>In</strong> the editio princeps, it is divided into three<br />

sedarim (“orders”): (a) Chapters 1–6; (b) 6:1–9:6; (c) 9:7–the<br />

end of the book of Ecclesiastes. <strong>In</strong> later editions however it<br />

is also divided into 12 sections, corresponding to the biblical<br />

chapters. The Midrash opens with an anonymous proem of<br />

the classical type found in amoraic Midrashim. It begins with<br />

an extraneous verse from the Book of Proverbs which is then<br />

connected with the opening words of the Book of Ecclesiastes.<br />

It bears, however, a few signs of lateness, including its (introductory<br />

formula): “This is what the Scripture declared in the<br />

holy spirit by Solomon king of Israel.”<br />

The Language<br />

Ecclesiastes Rabbah is written for the most part in mishnaic<br />

Hebrew. Galilean Aramaic is also used, and there are numerous<br />

Greek words.<br />

The Date of its Redaction<br />

The redactor used tannaitic literature, the Jerusalem *Talmud,<br />

*Genesis Rabbah, *Leviticus Rabbah, *Lamentations Rabbah,<br />

and *Esther Rabbah. The work also incorporates material<br />

taken from the Babylonian *Talmud, some of which, however,<br />

was added later. Several factors indicate that Ecclesiastes<br />

Rabbah is of a comparatively late date, having been redacted<br />

apparently not earlier than the eighth century C.E. It was used<br />

by the paytan *Solomon b. Judah ha-Bavli, who flourished in<br />

the second half of the tenth century C.E., and it is quoted by<br />

*Nathan b. Jehiel in his Arukh (c. 1100). Ecclesiastes Rabbah<br />

contains much important material of the tannaitic and amoraic<br />

periods, and also numerous aggadot of a polemical character,<br />

some with anti-Christian references.<br />

Editions<br />

Ecclesiastes Rabbah was first published at Pesaro in 1519, together<br />

with Midrashim on the four other scrolls (Song of<br />

Songs, Ruth, Lamentations, and Esther) to which, however,<br />

it is entirely unrelated. The many subsequent ones are based<br />

on this edition. Although several manuscripts of Ecclesiastes<br />

Rabbah are extant (the earliest dating from the 14th century),<br />

a complete scholarly edition has yet to appear. M. Hirshman<br />

edited the four first chapters of the book in his dissertation<br />

90 ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!