28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

term “holy convocation” to mean that the festivals are to be<br />

sanctified “with food and drink and clean clothes” and “the<br />

Day of Atonement, on which there is no food or drink, the<br />

<strong>Torah</strong> states that one must honor it with clean clothes” (Shab.<br />

119a). It was usual to cut one’s hair before the festivals. Similarly,<br />

it was the custom, later incorporated in the halakhah,<br />

not to work or eat in the late afternoon preceding the festival.<br />

<strong>In</strong> the Middle Ages, it became customary to light a candle<br />

on the eve of the festival and to recite a blessing, as on the<br />

Sabbath. Rejoicing on the festival involved eating and drinking<br />

(concerning the prohibition of fasting see Judith 8:6; TJ,<br />

Ta’an. 2:12) and giving presents to the women and children.<br />

During the tannaitic period the sages disputed the question<br />

as to how a person should spend the festival: “R. Eliezer says<br />

that a person should either eat and drink or sit and study on<br />

the festival; R. Joshua declares that a person’s time should be<br />

divided between eating and drinking and the house of learning.”<br />

R. Johanan, the amora, found support in the Scriptures<br />

for both opinions (Pes. 68b; cf. Beẓah 15b; Sif. Deut. 135, is<br />

similar to R. Joshua’s opinion). The amoraim also disagreed<br />

on the similar question as to whether the festivals were meant<br />

for the study of <strong>Torah</strong>, or whether eating and drinking was<br />

the main reason and permission to study the <strong>Torah</strong> on them<br />

but a secondary consideration (TJ, Shab. 15:3). According to<br />

the sources, it seems that it was customary to go to the bet hamidrash<br />

both on the eve of the festival as well as in the morning.<br />

Prayers, however, were shortened because of the festive<br />

meal. The sages, while stating that “the festivals were given to<br />

Israel only for their own pleasure” (S. Buber (ed.), Midrash<br />

Tanḥuma (1885), Mid. Tanḥuma Gen. 4), nevertheless noted<br />

the difference between Israel and the nations: “You grant the<br />

nations many festivals and they eat, drink, and are wanton,<br />

they go to the theater, the circus, and anger You by word and<br />

deed; but Israel is not so. You grant them festivals and they<br />

eat, drink, and rejoice, and go to the synagogues and battei<br />

midrash (“houses of learning”) and multiply their prayers,<br />

their festival offerings, and their sacrifices” (PdRK 340–1).<br />

It seems that R. Joshua’s opinion (“half to the Lord and half<br />

for yourselves”) was practiced and became halakhah. However,<br />

practices of drunkenness and licentiousness are also<br />

mentioned (Beẓah 4a; Kid. 81a); R. Abba bar Memel, a Palestinian<br />

amora, states, “Did they not forbid work on the intermediate<br />

days only in order that people should eat, drink,<br />

and diligently study the <strong>Torah</strong>? But they eat, drink, and are<br />

wanton” (TJ, MK 2:3) – exactly as the Midrash describes the<br />

gentile nations.<br />

Paul opposed the observance of the Sabbath and the<br />

festivals (Gal. 4:10; Col. 2:16). Traces of the Jewish-Christian<br />

dispute concerning the festivals are found in the Midrash (S.<br />

Buber (ed.), Midrash Tanḥuma (1885), Pinḥas, para. 17). The<br />

sharp condemnation by the sages of “he who despises the festivals”<br />

(Avot 3:12; Pes. 118a) is probably directed against the<br />

Christian heretics, and probably because of them the observance<br />

of the Sabbath and the festivals was stressed so strongly<br />

in Ereẓ Israel. Later, in the Middle Ages, Judah Halevi states<br />

festivals<br />

that the festivals were the main factor which upheld Israel in<br />

its exile (Kuzari 3:10).<br />

The <strong>In</strong>termediate Days<br />

Apart from the laws governing the musaf sacrifices on the festivals,<br />

nothing is stated about the festival days following the<br />

first day of Passover and Sukkot, respectively, which the sages<br />

called ḥolo shel mo’ed or just mo’ed. They taught that these days<br />

are also to be considered as days of “holy convocation.” Only<br />

partial work is permitted on them for “the <strong>Torah</strong> gave the sages<br />

the power of determining on which day it is forbidden to do<br />

work and on which day it is allowed; which work is forbidden<br />

and which allowed” (Sif. Deut. 135). Generally, work which<br />

prevents deterioration or loss is permitted on the intermediate<br />

days; where this is not the case, work is forbidden. It is forbidden<br />

to delay work in order to do it on the intermediate days<br />

except for public works. <strong>In</strong> Ereẓ Israel stringent laws were imposed<br />

whereby no work at all was done, even if it was required<br />

for the festival itself. The halakhah, however, conformed to the<br />

Babylonian practice which allowed some work (as mentioned<br />

above). All must rejoice on the intermediate days; thus marriage<br />

is not permitted on these days as rejoicing should not be<br />

mixed, ein me’arevim simḥah be-simḥah (MK 8b).<br />

[Moshe David Herr]<br />

Second Days of Festivals<br />

<strong>In</strong> the Diaspora an extra day (in Heb. yom tov sheni shel galuyyot)<br />

is added to each of the biblical festival days, except for<br />

ḥol ha-mo’ed and the Day of Atonement. The practice originated<br />

because of the uncertainty in the Diaspora of the day on<br />

which the Sanhedrin announced the New Moon. Later, when<br />

astronomical calculations were relied upon, the sages declared<br />

that the custom should nevertheless be accepted as permanent.<br />

Although the Day of Atonement was an exception, as a double<br />

fast day was considered too difficult, there were individuals<br />

who observed two days. Rosh Ha-Shanah, on the other hand,<br />

gradually came to be observed as a two-day festival even in<br />

Ereẓ Israel; beginnings of the custom here, too, are to be found<br />

in the Second Temple period (RH 4:4), although it became universal<br />

only in the Middle Ages. With regard to Passover and<br />

Sukkot, the first day of ḥol ha-mo’ed was observed as a full festival<br />

day in the Diaspora while an additional day was added at<br />

the end. Thus on Passover a second seder is held on the second<br />

night and an eighth day is added. The day following Shemini<br />

Aẓeret at the completion of Sukkot became known as Simḥat<br />

<strong>Torah</strong>, the “Rejoicing of the Law.” As long as the new moon<br />

was determined by visual evidence, there was no fixed date for<br />

Shavuot, so that the day of the festival was not in any doubt<br />

as it was always on the 50th day counting from the second day<br />

of Passover, which day would have been ratified in good time<br />

by the Sanhedrin messengers. Despite this, a second day was<br />

observed in the Diaspora for Shavuot as well. It would appear<br />

that certain sources regard the second day as a punishment<br />

and that for its observance no reward is to be expected (TJ,<br />

Eruv. 3:9). The only difference in observance between the additional<br />

days and regular festival days is in the practice con-<br />

ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6 769

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!