28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The sensational death of Robert Maxwell in November<br />

1991 was followed rapidly by the collapse of his business empire<br />

and the revelation that he had stolen hundreds of millions<br />

of pounds from his employees’ pension fund in order to<br />

prop up the share value of his companies. His sons were subsequently<br />

arrested for abetting this fraud and await trial. Although<br />

Maxwell’s ostentatious burial on the Mount of Olives<br />

could not help but draw attention to his Jewish roots, media<br />

commentary was relatively restrained. However, it was widely<br />

considered that Maxwell and the Jewish entrepreneurs in the<br />

Guinness case were outsiders in the City. This denied them<br />

protection by the “old boys” network when their schemes, in<br />

no way unique, ran foul of the law.<br />

British Jews were, on the whole, spared violent forms of<br />

antisemitism. The exception was 1990 when, over a 12-month<br />

period there were 29 cases of vandalism against Jewish cemeteries,<br />

synagogues, and Holocaust memorials in the London<br />

area alone and seven reported cases of physical assault on Jewish<br />

persons. This violence is miniscule compared to the assault<br />

on non-white minorities, but the attacks provoked media<br />

comment and provoked reassuring statements from the<br />

prime minister in May 1990.<br />

The most prevalent form of anti-Jewish action in Britain<br />

has been the distribution of antisemitic literature. <strong>In</strong> November<br />

1990, Greville Janner, MP, sponsored an early day motion<br />

in the House of Commons which attracted the names of 100<br />

MPs in support of suppressing the circulation of Holocaust<br />

Denial material. <strong>In</strong> March 1991, Dowager Lady Birdwood was<br />

charged under the Public Order Act (1986) for distributing<br />

the ritual murder accusation against the Jews. She was subsequently<br />

found guilty and given a two-year unconditional<br />

discharge. <strong>In</strong> December 1992, glossily produced pseudo-<br />

Ḥanukkah cards containing doggerel that embraced antisemitic<br />

libels were sent to hundreds of Jewish organizations and<br />

prominent individuals. Police investigations failed to identify<br />

the source of this “hate mail” and the Government has consistently<br />

rebuffed pleas by the Board of Deputies, most recently<br />

in October 1992, for a community libel law.<br />

The announcement that a gathering of Holocaust Denial<br />

practitioners would be held in London in November<br />

1991 led to demands that the home secretary ban the entry<br />

of Robert Faurrison and Fred Leuchter. Leuchter actually entered<br />

the country illegally and was deported after showing<br />

up at a “conference” that was heavily-picketed by anti-fascist<br />

groups. David *Irving, sometime British historian and now<br />

a propagandist well known for addressing neo-Nazi rallies<br />

in Germany, had become a linchpin in this shadowy global<br />

network.<br />

Jews and the Holocaust figured in several historical controversies.<br />

<strong>In</strong> 1987 Jim Allen’s anti-Zionist play Perdition deployed<br />

the canard that Zionists collaborated with the Nazis.<br />

Production was canceled after expressions of outrage from<br />

the Jewish community and intense media scrutiny, but this<br />

only inflamed the debate. The War Crimes Bill occasioned<br />

many reflections on the Holocaust, often yoked disturbingly<br />

england<br />

to Jewish terrorism in Palestine in 1946–47. <strong>In</strong> January 1992,<br />

when Irving claimed to have discovered new Eichmann papers<br />

the press treated him as a right-wing historian whose views<br />

merited serious reportage. <strong>In</strong> July 1992, the Sunday Times<br />

caused a storm of controversy by employing him to transcribe<br />

and comment on newly revealed portions of Goebbels’<br />

diary.<br />

Alan Clark, junior defense minister, was widely condemned<br />

in December 1991 for attending a party to launch the<br />

revised version of Irving’s book Hitler’s War in which Irving<br />

states that Hitler was innocent of the Final Solution and denies<br />

the existence of gas chambers for killing Jews. Clark later<br />

endorsed a political biography of Churchill by John Charmley,<br />

which appeared in January 1993, that suggested Britain<br />

should have made peace with Hitler in 1940 or 1941. Clark<br />

and Charmley agreed that there was little to choose between<br />

Stalinism and Nazism, and that the plight of the Jews under<br />

Nazism was a marginal issue. The exposure in the Guardian<br />

newspaper in May and December 1992 of war crimes in the<br />

Nazi-occupied Channel Islands, and the concurrence of the<br />

local authorities in the deportation of Jews, shed a different<br />

light on the matter. The Irving affair reached a head when Irving<br />

filed a libel suit in 1996 against Deborah Lipstadt and her<br />

British publisher, Penguin Books, claiming that Lipstadt’s Denying<br />

the Holocaust had accused him of being a Nazi apologist,<br />

Holocaust denier, racist, and antisemite. Lipstadt contended<br />

that this was precisely what he was, and the Court agreed in<br />

its 2001 verdict denying his suit.<br />

Controversy also surrounded efforts to set up an eruv<br />

in the London borough of Barnet. The project was launched<br />

by the United Synagogue “Eruv Committee” in 1987. <strong>In</strong> June<br />

1992 it was passed by the Public Works Committee of Barnet<br />

Council. It was then considered by the Hampstead Garden<br />

Suburb Trust, which manages this architecturally unique<br />

suburban area. At a stormy meeting in September 1992, the<br />

Trust’s chairman, Lord MacGregor, was censured for approving<br />

a letter to Barnet Council advising it to reject the plan and<br />

calling the eruv “a very unpleasant exhibition of fundamentalism.”<br />

He subsequently resigned. This fracas made the eruv<br />

into a heated issue locally and in the national newspapers. On<br />

February 24, 1993, the council’s planning committee defeated<br />

the eruv proposal by 11 to 7 votes. Jewish councilors were split<br />

and it generated fierce opposition from both Orthodox and<br />

“assimilationist” Jews. It was also attacked by non-Jews unable<br />

to accept the public expression of Jewish difference.<br />

<strong>In</strong> June 1992 the prime minister, John Major, appointed<br />

two Jews to his new government: Michael Howard became<br />

secretary of state for the environment and Malcolm Rifkind<br />

was appointed secretary of state for defense. After a cabinet<br />

reshuffle in March 1993, Howard was made home secretary. <strong>In</strong><br />

November 2003, however, Howard was elected leader of the<br />

British Conservative Party, the first Jewish leader of a government<br />

or opposition party in Britain in the 20th century. Howard<br />

stepped down after the 2005 elections. Another reshuffle<br />

in September 1995 led to Rifkind’s appointment as foreign sec-<br />

ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6 425

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!