28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ESCAPA, JOSEPH BEN SAUL (1570–1662), Turkish rabbi<br />

and author. Escapa was the descendant of a family from Castile<br />

which settled in *Salonika. He served there as head of a<br />

yeshivah, and was a colleague of Ḥayyim *Shabbetai. From<br />

about 1620 he was rabbi of the Salonikan community in<br />

Smyrna, and in 1648 was appointed rabbi of all the congregations<br />

of the city. Under his leadership, the united Smyrna community<br />

became one of the most important in Turkey. Gifted<br />

with administrative ability, he introduced regulations concerning<br />

the collection of taxes and the supervision of communal<br />

affairs; these practices are followed to the present day by the<br />

community of Smyrna and surrounding territory. Escapa’s enactments<br />

were collected by R. Joshua Judah and published in<br />

his Avodat Massa (Salonika, 1846). Escapa was one of the most<br />

vehement opponents of *Shabbetai Ẓevi, who was his disciple<br />

and whom he had ordained, and proclaimed it a religious duty<br />

to put Shabbetai Ẓevi to death. Escapa wrote a commentary<br />

on the Shulḥan Arukh, called Rosh Yosef, of which only sections<br />

– on Oraḥ Ḥayyim (Smyrna, 1657), and Ḥoshen Mishpat<br />

(ibid., 1659) – were published. He also wrote responsa (Frankfurt<br />

on the Oder, 1709), and a work on *Maimonides which<br />

has remained in manuscript.<br />

Bibliography: J. Sasportas, Ẓiẓat Novel Ẓevi, ed. by I. Tishbi<br />

(1954), 378, index; Conforte, Kore, 46a; Rosanes, Togarmah, 2 (1938),<br />

208–10; Werses, in: Yavneh, 3 (1942), 101ff.; Scholem, Shabbetai Ẓevi,<br />

89–90, 113, 119–20, 140, 304–5.<br />

ESCHATOLOGY. <strong>In</strong> general, the term “eschatology” designates<br />

the doctrine concerning “the last things.” The word<br />

“last” can be understood either absolutely as referring to the<br />

ultimate destiny of mankind in general or of each individual<br />

man, or relatively as referring to the end of a certain period<br />

in the history of mankind or of a nation that is followed by<br />

another, entirely different, historical period.<br />

introduction<br />

The Bible has no word for the abstract idea of eschatology. It<br />

does, however, have a term – ʾaḥarit ha-yamim – that often has<br />

eschatological connotations, at least in the broad sense mentioned<br />

above. It means literally “the end of the days,” i.e., “the<br />

end of time.” Just as the cognate Akkadian term, ina aḥrât ūmī<br />

(from the older ina aḥriāt ūmī), often shortened to ina aḥrâti,<br />

means simply “in the future” or “for [all] the future,” so also<br />

the Hebrew term be-ʾaḥarit ha-yamim can sometimes mean<br />

merely “in the future, in time to come,” without necessarily<br />

having any eschatological connotation (thus, e.g., Deut. 4:30;<br />

31:29; cf. ʾaḥarit, “a future,” in Jer. 29:11; et al.). <strong>In</strong> the Prophets,<br />

however, be-ʾaḥarit ha-yamim generally has an eschatological<br />

connotation (see below).<br />

<strong>In</strong> the last few centuries before the destruction of the<br />

Second Temple, a new term with a strictly eschatological<br />

meaning in the absolute sense appears. This term, keẓ (qeẓ)<br />

ha-yamim, means literally “the term of the days” (Dan. 12:13b;<br />

cf. the similar term, ʿet qeẓ “the time of the term,” Dan. 8:17;<br />

11:35, 40; 12:4, 9).<br />

eschatology<br />

Some scholars have sought to derive Israelite eschatological<br />

ideas from similar concepts of its ancient neighbors, Egypt<br />

and Babylonia. At most, there may have been some borrowings<br />

from these sources by the Prophets in the secondary details<br />

of their descriptions dealing with the horrendous conditions<br />

of the eschatological period. More likely, the features for<br />

which there are early extra-Israelite parallels were concepts<br />

common to the entire ancient Near East. Essentially, eschatology<br />

in Israel is an inner-Israelite development. Only in the<br />

very later period, i.e., in Daniel and the so-called intertestamental<br />

literature of the Jews, can a certain amount of borrowing<br />

from Persian sources be shown as probable.<br />

It is difficult to date several eschatological oracles. <strong>In</strong> certain<br />

cases where, for instance, reference is made in a pre-Exilic<br />

prophet to Jerusalem as already destroyed and the people of<br />

Judah as already in exile, it is legitimate to suggest that such<br />

passages are later insertions into the pre-Exilic Prophets. However,<br />

when such criteria are lacking, the supposition should<br />

normally be that the eschatological oracles in question belong<br />

to the pre-Exilic prophet to whom they are attributed.<br />

in the bible<br />

For the sake of showing how eschatological ideas evolved in<br />

ancient Israel, it is useful to consider the preprophetic period,<br />

the early prophetic oracles, the later pre-Exilic Prophets, and<br />

the Exilic and post-Exilic Prophets.<br />

Pre-Prophetic Period<br />

<strong>In</strong> the age of the Patriarchs, of Moses and Joshua, and of the<br />

Judges, and in the first few centuries of the monarchy there is<br />

little evidence of true eschatology. Yet the basis of later Israelite<br />

eschatology was really laid down in that early age. From<br />

the time of Abraham on, those descendants of his who later<br />

called themselves bene Yisrael, “the Israelites,” venerated their<br />

one and only God as a “living God,” i.e., as one who took an<br />

active part in the history of His people. They were conscious<br />

of the fact that He had made them His “*chosen people.”<br />

Since He was not only the special God of Israel but also the<br />

sole Lord of the entire world, Israelite religion combined a<br />

certain “particularism” as the “chosen people” with a certain<br />

universalism, which looked forward to their God’s reign over<br />

all mankind. They regarded Him as a just God, who would<br />

reward or punish all men according to their morally good or<br />

evil lives. Because of His *covenant with His chosen people, He<br />

proves Himself to be faithful and loyal to His promises (thus<br />

showing His frequently praised ʾemet or ʾemunah, “faithfulness,”<br />

and ḥesed, “mercy”); therefore in times of need He sends<br />

His people “saviors,” such as Moses and Joshua, the various<br />

“Judges,” and especially David, the ideal mashi’aḥ, “anointed”<br />

(see *Messiah) king, who was promised an everlasting dynasty<br />

(II Sam. 7:11–16). The hope and expectation that this relationship<br />

between the God of Israel and His people would continue<br />

in the future led to the genuine eschatology that is found in<br />

the books of the so-called “writing” Prophets (as distinct from<br />

such earlier prophets as Elijah and Elisha). The essential ori-<br />

ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6 489

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!