28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ano at the Liceo Musicale in Bologna and became director of<br />

the conservatories of Parma (1905–11), Naples (1912–16), and<br />

Palermo (1916–22). He ended his career at the Milan Conservatory<br />

(1922–38, 1945–47) as a piano teacher. His works include<br />

an opera, Iuturna (1903), La tentazione di Gesù (1909),<br />

and Impressioni sinfoniche da Napoleone (1949) for orchestra;<br />

Andante appassionato for violin and piano (1908); piano music:<br />

Sonatina op.5 (1906) and four fantasies, op.6 (1906), Sonata,<br />

E (1920), Imago, Solitudo (1933) and Rimembranze (1950);<br />

and songs. Among his writings are Pensieri sulla musica (Bologna,<br />

1903), I regi istituti musicali d’Italia e il disegno di ruolo per<br />

il Conservatorio di Milano (Parma, 1908), Le Studio del Pianoforte<br />

(3 vols., 1923–24), and <strong>In</strong>troduction to F. Fano: Giuseppe<br />

Martucci: saggio biografico-critico (Milan, 1950), 7–13.<br />

Bibliography: Grove online; MGG; Dizionario biografico<br />

degli italiani (1960– ); Dizionario enciclopedico universale della musica<br />

e dei musicisti.<br />

[Israela Stein (2nd ed.)]<br />

FANO, MENAHEM AZARIAH DA (1548–1620), Italian<br />

rabbi and kabbalist. The scion of a wealthy family and a prolific<br />

author, he was a recognized authority on rabbinic law<br />

and the foremost exponent in the West of the kabbalistic system<br />

of Moses *Cordovero. Under the influence of Israel *Sarug,<br />

who during his stay in Italy spread the knowledge of the<br />

mystical system of Isaac *Luria, Menahem Azariah became<br />

an admirer of the latter, though without departing from the<br />

system of Moses Cordovero. A pupil of R. Ishmael Ḥanina<br />

of Valmontone in Ferrara, he was active in Ferrara, Venice,<br />

Reggio, and Mantua. Together with his brothers he aided the<br />

victims of the earthquake of 1570. He was a patron of Jewish<br />

learning, contributing funds for the publication of such<br />

works as Cordovero’s Pardes Rimmonim (Salonika, 1584) and<br />

Joseph Caro’s commentary Kesef Mishneh (Venice, 1574–76)<br />

on Maimonides’ Code.<br />

Fano’s fame as a talmudist is borne out by the collection<br />

of 130 responsa bearing his name which was published in 1600<br />

in Venice and in 1788 in Dyhernfurth. His style of writing was<br />

precise and he displayed considerable originality in the views<br />

he expressed. He enjoyed great popularity as a teacher, attracting<br />

students from far and wide, from Germany as well as Italy.<br />

One of his disciples compared him to an angel of God in<br />

appearance. His gentleness and humility showed themselves<br />

in his refusal to answer adverse criticism leveled against him<br />

by a contemporary scholar on account of certain statements<br />

he made with regard to the ritual of the lulav on the festival<br />

of Tabernacles. Amadeo Recanati dedicated to him his Italian<br />

translation of Maimonides’ Guide of the Perplexed; Isaiah<br />

*Horowitz praised his theological treatise Yonat Elem (Amsterdam,<br />

1648) saying of it, “the overwhelming majority of his<br />

words, and perhaps all of them, are true, and his <strong>Torah</strong> is true”<br />

(introduction to Novelot Ḥokhmah (Basle, 1631) by Joseph<br />

*Delmedigo). Seventeen of his works have been published.<br />

These include a summary of the legal decisions of Isaac *Alfasi<br />

and his own major work on the Kabbalah, entitled Asarah<br />

fārābĪ, abŪ naṢR muḥammad, al-<br />

Ma’amarot (only parts have been printed, Venice, 1597); Kanfei<br />

Yonah (Korzec, 1786), a kabbalistic work on prayer; and Gilgulei<br />

Neshamot (Prague, 1688) on the transmigration of the<br />

soul. Many of his kabbalistic interpretations must have been<br />

made for the first time in the course of sermons delivered by<br />

him. Extant in manuscript are liturgical poems, elegies, comments<br />

on the teachings of Isaac Luria, and a voluminous correspondence.<br />

He died in Mantua.<br />

Bibliography: L. Woidislawski, Toledot Rabbenu Menaḥem<br />

Azaryah mi-Fano (1903); S. Simonsohn, Toledot ha-Yehudim be-Dukkasut<br />

Mantovah (1964), 665, index, S.V.; M.A. Szulwas, Ḥayyei ha-Yehudim<br />

be-Italyah bi-Tekufat ha-Renaissance (1955) 196, 220.<br />

[Samuel Rosenblatt]<br />

°FĀRĀBĪ, ABŪ NAṢR MUḤAMMAD, AL- (c. 870–c. 950),<br />

one of the greatest philosophers of the medieval Islamic world.<br />

Al-Fārābī had considerable influence on Jewish philosophers,<br />

particularly *Maimonides. Having spent most of his life in<br />

*Baghdad, he became associated in 942 with the illustrious<br />

court of Sayf al-Dawla, the Ḥamdānid ruler of Syria, residing<br />

mainly in *Aleppo.<br />

Al-Fārābī played a major role in the dissemination of<br />

ancient philosophy in the Islamic world. His teacher was the<br />

Nestorian Yuḥannā ibn Ḥaylān (see M. Meyerhof, Von Alexandrien<br />

nach Bagdad (1930), 405, 414, 416ff.). He was thus familiar<br />

with the Christian tradition of Aristotelian studies initially<br />

cultivated in *Alexandria and transmitted by Syriac-speaking<br />

Christians to the Islamic world. While in Baghdad, al-Fārābī<br />

apparently had contacts with the Christian Baghdad school of<br />

Aristotelian studies, the leading member of which was Mattā<br />

ibn Yūnus. Aristotle was studied together with his commentators,<br />

*Alexander of Aphrodisias and *Themistius, as well as<br />

with commentators of the neoplatonic school of Alexandria<br />

(Ammonius son of Hermias and his pupils). The paramount<br />

philosophical task al-Fārābī faced was to naturalize the pagan<br />

philosophic tradition of antiquity within the confines of a society<br />

structured by a revealed law.<br />

His Philosophy<br />

The bulk of al-Fārābī’s teaching and writing was devoted to<br />

interpreting Aristotle, particularly the logical works. He wrote<br />

commentaries and paraphrases on the entire Organon. <strong>In</strong> natural<br />

philosophy he followed the Physics closely. His metaphysics<br />

is a blend of the Metaphysics and neoplatonism. Creation<br />

is viewed by him as an atemporal process of emanation which<br />

flows from the unique, unqualified First Being. Al-Fārābī combines<br />

the neoplatonic theory of emanation with the Aristotelian-Ptolemaic<br />

*cosmology which posits a system of celestial<br />

spheres and their intelligences encompassing the sublunar<br />

world. The intelligence of the last sphere (the moon) presides<br />

over the sublunar world and is called the active *intellect. Al-<br />

Fārābī thus follows that interpretation of the nous poietikós<br />

(“active intellect”; De anima, 3), which regards it as a cosmic<br />

entity. The active intellect is “the Giver of Forms” (wāhib alṣuwar<br />

; dator formarum): it conveys forms to the world, thus<br />

ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6 709

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!