28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

cannot be identified with the Zealots; here, the more usual<br />

explanation – that Epictetus was referring to Christians – is<br />

preferable.<br />

Bibliography: Reinach, Textes, 154–5.<br />

[Menahem Stern]<br />

EPICUREANISM, a philosophy of adjustment to the social<br />

changes after *Alexander the Great (336–323), founded by Epicurus,<br />

342/1–270 B.C.E., “the most revered and the most reviled<br />

of all founders of thought in the Greco-Roman world”<br />

(De Witt). Recent scholarship sees in it a “bridge” to certain<br />

rabbinic and Christian moods. Epicurus taught freedom from<br />

fear and desire through knowledge as the natural and pleasurable<br />

life. He endorsed religious observance but denied earthly<br />

involvement of the perfect gods and with it providence, presage,<br />

punishment, and penitential prayer. The transformation<br />

of Epicureanism into a competitive sect celebrating Epicurus<br />

as “savior” increased the already existing opposition to it.<br />

Rhetorical literature falsely accused Epicurus of materialistic<br />

hedonism. Complaints of Epicurean dogmatism, “beguiling<br />

speech” (Col. 2:4), and compelling argumentation (of Avot<br />

2:14 “…[know] what to answer the Epicurean”) are frequently<br />

heard. Rabbinic condemnation reflects knowledge of Greco-<br />

Roman rhetoric, experiences with individuals and centers<br />

(Gadara, Gaza, Caesarea), and, possibly, the favoritism shown<br />

to Epicureanism by *Antiochus Epiphanes and *Hadrian.<br />

“Epicurean” became thus a byword for “deviance” – ranging<br />

from disrespect to atheism – in Philo, Josephus, and rabbinism<br />

alike (see *Apikoros). An early unexpanded version of the<br />

“four who entered ‘Paradise’” (Ḥag. 14b) may once have signified<br />

Epicurus’ school (“the garden”), since it fits Akiva’s past,<br />

Ben Azzai’s celibacy and many Epicurean sayings, Elisha b.<br />

Avuyah’s heterodoxy, and Ben Zoma’s gnosticism (Epicureanism<br />

and Gnosticism were equated also by the Church Fathers).<br />

Akiva’s “mystical” admonition (Ḥag. 14b) could easily<br />

have been a parody on the “apocalyptic”-enthusiastic style of<br />

the Epicureans (parallel parody H. Usener, Epicurea, fragm.<br />

364; Gen. R. 1:5, Theodor-Albeck, p. 2 mentions “nothing<br />

from nothing”; Mid. Ps. to 1:22 the “automatic” universe; cf.<br />

Jos., Ant., 10:280).<br />

Agreements, however, both in content and literary form,<br />

between rabbinism and Epicureanism are striking: study for<br />

its own sake (Vatican fragment 45 and Avot 6:1); removal of<br />

doubt (Life 121b, Doctr. 22 and Avot 1:16); mortality and urgency<br />

(Vat. fr. 10 and Avot 2:15); acquisition of a companion<br />

(To Menoeceus, end, and Avot 1:6); diet of bread and water<br />

(Bailey, fr. 37 and Avot 6:4); satisfaction with one’s lot (Bailey,<br />

fr. 69–70 and Avot 4:1); and avoidance of public office (Bailey,<br />

fr. 85–87; Vat. fr. 58; Doctr. 7 and Avot 1:10–11; 2:3; etc.). Epicurus<br />

anticipated Judaism’s denial of astral divinity and rule.<br />

With the general rise of the lower classes he accorded human<br />

dignity even to the prostitute, an evaluation continued in the<br />

Midrash (Sif. Num. 78; Gen. R. 85:8) and the Gospels (Matt.<br />

1:3; 5, etc.). <strong>In</strong> Hellenism and Christianity, too, denunciation<br />

of Epicurus together with partial adoption of his ethics is fre-<br />

episcopus judaeorum<br />

quent. The centrality of the sage in post-Socratic ethics and<br />

rhetoric facilitated such developments.<br />

Bibliography: C. Bailey, Epicurus (Greek and Eng., 1926);<br />

N.W. De Witt, Epicurus and his Philosophy (1954); A.M.J. Festugiére,<br />

Epicurus and his Gods (1956); S. Lieberman, in: A. Altmann (ed.),<br />

Biblical and Other Studies (1963), 123–41; Reallexikon fuer Antike und<br />

Christentum, 5 (1962), 681–819, S.V. Epikur (contains bibliography).<br />

[Henry Albert Fischel]<br />

EPIRUS, province in N.W. Greece. Epirus was an independent<br />

despotate between c. 1214 and 1340. Under the first and<br />

strongest of its despots, Theodore Ducas Angelus, the Jews (see<br />

*Durazzo, *Arta, *Ioannina) were subjected to a persecution<br />

in which Jewish property was confiscated and Judaism probably<br />

prohibited. This was subsequently extended to Salonika,<br />

captured by Theodore in 1224, and continued even after Salonika<br />

was retaken from Epirus in 1246. With the strengthening<br />

of the empire under *Michael VIII Palaeologus, parts of<br />

Epirus reverted to the empire and the persecutions came to<br />

an end. His son Andronicus II Palaeologus placed the Jews<br />

of Ioannina (Janina), the most important of the Epirote communities,<br />

under his direct protection and angered the Church<br />

by favoring the Jews.<br />

Bibliography: J. Starr, Romania (Eng., 1949), 20–23; J.<br />

Mann, in: REJ, 82 (1926), 372–3; P. Charanis, in: Speculum, 22 (1947),<br />

75–76.<br />

[Andrew Sharf]<br />

EPISCOPUS JUDAEORUM (Lat. “bishop of the Jews”), title<br />

given by the Christian authorities in the Middle Ages to the<br />

head of the Jewish community or its rabbi. The significance<br />

of the title, which is much disputed, is sometimes clarified<br />

when Hebrew and Latin forms are found side by side. <strong>In</strong> Germany<br />

the title is mentioned in the privilege granted to the Jews<br />

of Worms in 1090, addressed to Salman the “Jews’ bishop,” a<br />

distinguished scholar. The “bishop” of the Jews in Worms,<br />

later called the hegmon parnas, was the permanent chairman<br />

of the community board; the last man to hold the title,<br />

Michael Gernstein, died in 1792. <strong>In</strong> Cologne the first “bishop”<br />

of the Jews is mentioned from 1135 to 1159. His successors<br />

were in office for long terms, although elections were held annually;<br />

some of them were rabbis. <strong>In</strong> Silesia, the “Jews’ bishop”<br />

held the offices of rabbi, ritual slaughterer, cantor, and religious<br />

teacher in 1315. Found in England in the 12th century,<br />

the term (Eveske in Anglo-French) was sometimes equivalent<br />

to the Hebrew kohen. It is therefore impossible to<br />

maintain that in England it denoted an official rabbinical<br />

position.<br />

Bibliography: Baron, Community, 1 (1942), index; R. Hoeniger<br />

and M. Stern (eds.), Das Judenschreinsbuch der Laurenzpfarre zu<br />

Koeln, 1 (1888), nos. 234–40; J. Jacobs, Jews of Angevin England (1893),<br />

202–4, 372–3; Aronius, Regesten, nos. 171, 581; H. Stokes, Studies in<br />

Anglo-Jewish History (1913), 18–43; Roth, England, 94–95; H.G. Richardson,<br />

English Jewry under Angevin Kings (1960), 124–9.<br />

[Isaac Levitats]<br />

ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6 463

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!