28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EDUCATION, JEWISH<br />

<strong>In</strong> addition to diplomacy and the exact sciences, the<br />

court bureaucracy developed what might be termed a “scribal<br />

ethic.” <strong>Wisdom</strong> literature, more specifically the collections<br />

now found in the Book of Proverbs, served as a primary text<br />

for character education: they focused on the individual’s rather<br />

than on the national interest.<br />

Like the comparative Egyptian material, and the Book of<br />

*Ahikar (Aramaic), the Book of Proverbs was an outstanding<br />

example of court literature. The book was meant to serve in<br />

educating king and courtier (8:15–18) but especially the bureaucracy<br />

(22:29). The virtues stressed by these pedagogues<br />

were, among others, religious piety, proper family relations,<br />

honesty, industry, sagacity, responsibility, social virtues, and<br />

loyalty to the king.<br />

Various literary methods were used as memory aids for<br />

the student. Key words (Prov. 25:4–5; 30:11–14) and common<br />

ideas (25:2–3, 5–6) tied together independent statements. Similarly<br />

alliteration (rash, rashaʿ, raʿ, 28:3–5) and repetition of the<br />

same or similar roots (25:18–20) served as learning devices.<br />

Other units might be formed as number series (30:15–33). Another<br />

mnemonic device was the alphabet acrostic (31:10–31).<br />

Foreign material was freely borrowed: Proverbs 22:17–<br />

24:22 bears a great resemblance to the “Thirty Sayings of<br />

Amen-em-Opet,” a famous Egyptian wisdom text (Pritchard,<br />

Texts, 421ff.).<br />

The Book of Proverbs may be the closest thing to an actual<br />

school text from the biblical period. Its explicit pedagogic<br />

goal, as well as its employment of mnemonic devices, supports<br />

this contention. The centrality of secular, royal figures (Solomon,<br />

Hezekiah, King Lemuel of Massa, “The Wise”) and its<br />

affinities to non-Israelite wisdom literature further argue for<br />

its role in the education of the officialdom.<br />

EDUCATION OF PRIEST AND PROPHET. The nature of the<br />

priest’s education can be determined through an inductive<br />

analysis of his manifold functions in biblical society.<br />

Foremost were the cultic duties centered on the elaborate<br />

and complicated sacrificial rites. Later, the sacrifice was<br />

accompanied by music and song, performed by levitic families,<br />

versed in liturgical composition (I Chron. 25).<br />

Giving rulings on questions of ritual law and ritual purity<br />

was intrinsic to the priest’s responsibilities (Lev. 10:8–11; 12–15;<br />

Jer. 18:18; Haggai 2:11ff.; Mal. 1:4–8). The necessary knowledge<br />

for these decisions was no doubt acquired by training and<br />

study, including the study of the body and its diseases. Professional<br />

secular physicians are mentioned in II Chronicles 16:12<br />

(cf. Ecclus. 38:7; Pes. 4:9, a “book of medicines”).<br />

It was to the priests that Moses delivered the official copy<br />

of the <strong>Torah</strong> (Deut. 31:24–26; Jer. 2:8). They authenticated and<br />

supervised the writing of subsequent copies (Deut. 17:18–19;<br />

II Kings 22:8) and became the authoritative teachers of the<br />

<strong>Torah</strong> (Deut. 31:10–13; II Kings 17:28; II Chron. 17:8–9; Ezra<br />

the Scribe was a priest).<br />

The priesthood, though ultimately subject to the king<br />

administratively, supervised the Temple finances (II Kings<br />

12:8–17). (The Chronicler even has the priests assume trusted<br />

positions in the centralized government system of David and<br />

Solomon, I Chron. 26:30–32.) Their religious and secular functions<br />

demanded that they be literate. This is apparent also in<br />

the centrality of the written word in the cult (Ex. 34:27–28;<br />

Num. 5–23) and upon the sacred vestments (Ex. 28:21, 36).<br />

Though there are no actual records, the clergy must have<br />

received formal training. As was the case elsewhere, schools<br />

probably were part of the Temple complex.<br />

The clerical census counted priests only from the age of<br />

30 (Num. 4:3) and levites from the age of 25 (8:24), when they<br />

began to assume their cultic functions. This relatively late age<br />

indicated a long period of apprenticeship necessitated by their<br />

complex duties.<br />

Unlike the priesthood, there were no qualifications for<br />

joining the prophetic orders. Even women achieved renown<br />

as prophetesses (Miriam, Deborah, Huldah).<br />

The prophets attracted a following known as bene hanevi’im,<br />

“sons (i.e., disciples) of the prophets.” Some encouraged<br />

only a selected group of disciples (Isa. 8:18) or only a single<br />

protégé (Moses-Joshua; Elijah-Elisha; Jeremiah-Baruch). The<br />

disciple did not always succeed the master since true prophecy<br />

was not a skill to be learned but rather a result of divine<br />

election (II Kings 2:9–10).<br />

The disciple’s education was acquired through his ministering<br />

to the needs of the prophet. This type of training resembled<br />

the rabbinic concept of shimmush, attendance upon<br />

a master (Avot 1:3). This, of course, is not to say that there was<br />

no formal or literary side to the novices’ education. Several<br />

prophets may have been trained in the court schools (Isaiah<br />

and possibly Zephaniah); others had a priestly education<br />

(Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and possibly Malachi). Both schools provided<br />

a thorough knowledge of the national-religious literature<br />

and more.<br />

The prophetic order no doubt preserved and studied<br />

the words and deeds of their illustrious predecessors (Elijah<br />

and Elisha cycles; cf. II Kings 8:4; Jer. 26:17–18). The writings<br />

of the prophets show unmistakable signs of their acquaintance<br />

with the writings of their predecessors (Isaiah of Amos’,<br />

Zephaniah of Isaiah’s, Deutero-Isaiah with those of Isaiah,<br />

Zephaniah, and Jeremiah) as well as with the older psalms<br />

and other literature.<br />

There must have been some training in prophetic oration,<br />

and musical accompaniment (II Kings 3:15). An enlightening<br />

passage, reflecting prophetic training, in addition to the<br />

general popularity of the prophets’ presentation, is found in<br />

Ezekiel 33:30–33: “… the children of thy people that talk of thee<br />

by the walls and in the doors of the houses and speak one to<br />

another … Come, I pray you and hear what is the word that<br />

cometh forth from the Lord … and, lo, thou art unto them<br />

as a love song of one that hath a pleasant voice, and can play<br />

well on an instrument ….”<br />

THE EDUCATION OF WOMEN. Women’s education was conditioned<br />

by several cultural factors which limited and set the<br />

168 ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!