28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

england<br />

ident. <strong>In</strong> December 1992, the United Synagogue announced<br />

£0.8 million of cuts and a freeze on rabbis’ salaries. It wound<br />

up its three-year old sheḥitah operation, established as a result<br />

of the bitter “sheḥitah wars” in the 1980s, with a loss of<br />

£0.7 million.<br />

The search for economies underlay the amalgamation of<br />

the Jewish Blind Society and the Jewish Welfare Board to form<br />

Jewish Care in December 1988. <strong>In</strong> the recession of the early<br />

1980s and again in the slump of 1990–92, Jewish welfare organizations<br />

had to cater for Jewish unemployed persons, too,<br />

despite a shrinking income base. The second recession saw<br />

many of the fortunes built up by Jewish entrepreneurs in the<br />

1980s crumble. Grodzinski, the kasher baker, went into receivership<br />

in February 1991 after trading for 102 years. The famous<br />

kasher caterer Schaverin suffered a similar fate in November<br />

1991. <strong>In</strong> June 1992, the Glasgow Jewish Echo closed down after<br />

64 years of publication.<br />

Nor was Anglo-Jewry immune to the social problems afflicting<br />

the rest of society. <strong>In</strong> July 1991 David Rubin, son of an<br />

eminent rabbi, absconded after allegedly defrauding fellow-<br />

Jews of millions of pounds. A few weeks later, a child-abuse<br />

case in the Orthodox community of Stamford Hill led to violent<br />

demonstrations by members of the community against<br />

the family that had taken the matter to the police.<br />

Jewish communal institutions have been dogged by poor<br />

finances, while attempts at reorganization have had uneven<br />

success. <strong>In</strong> March 1993 the highly effective and inexpensive<br />

Association of Jewish 6th Formers (AJ6), which prepares Jewish<br />

teenagers for university, faced closure due to lack of funds.<br />

AJ6 received a last-minute reprieve, but the affair showed the<br />

need for a strategic funding policy. <strong>In</strong> April 1993, Lord Young,<br />

former Tory cabinet minister and businessman, initiated the<br />

Central Council of Jewish Social Services (CCJSS) which he<br />

envisaged as a directorate for British Jewry. <strong>In</strong> July 1993 he<br />

was elected chairman of the CCJSS, now embracing over 40<br />

Jewish organizations.<br />

Lord Young dismissed the Board of Deputies as inefficient<br />

and incapable of providing either policies or leadership.<br />

His view appeared to be confirmed when plans for its reform<br />

were stymied. <strong>In</strong> December 1993, the Board failed to give a<br />

two-thirds majority to measures to decrease the size of the executive,<br />

the number of Deputies, and the frequency of plenary<br />

meetings. The election of Eldred Tabachnik, QC, as president<br />

in June 1994 revived hopes of reform.<br />

The United Synagogue (US), which announced that it had<br />

lost £1 million on a disastrous sheḥitah operation in June 1993,<br />

pulled itself back into the black by means of draconian economies.<br />

A series of institutional reforms failed to placate women<br />

who demanded a greater say in its affairs (see below). The Rix<br />

Report on Jewish youth in September 1994 called for greater<br />

investment in youth work which was met with alacrity by the<br />

CJCS and other funding bodies. After a series of poor appeal<br />

results, the JIA was relaunched in October 1995.<br />

The most important communal initiative was the inauguration<br />

of Jewish Continuity in April 1993. Jewish Conti-<br />

nuity was intended to raise money to fund new and existing<br />

educational projects, invest in people to “champion” Judaism,<br />

and provide advice and guidance across the whole Jewish<br />

community. However, Continuity immediately aroused<br />

the suspicions of Progressive Jews because of the absence of<br />

any but Orthodox Jews from its directorate and staff. <strong>In</strong> May<br />

1994 an allocations board was set up that included members<br />

of the Reform and Liberal movements. Continuity hoped to<br />

avoid Orthodox criticism of this move by making the allocations<br />

board semi-detached, dispensing moneys given it for the<br />

purpose by Continuity. <strong>In</strong> July 1994, Continuity reached an<br />

agreement with the JIA that £12 million of the money raised<br />

by the JIA in Britain would go to educational projects identified<br />

by Continuity. <strong>In</strong> September 1994 it announced its first<br />

grants, totaling £435,000. The largest number and amount of<br />

grants went to Orthodox causes.<br />

During 1995, critics continued to charge Jewish Continuity<br />

with bias and a lack of strategy. <strong>In</strong> October 1995 it announced<br />

a major review of its operations, to determine what<br />

its role should be and end the confusion between its functions<br />

as grant giver and service provider. The review would also deal<br />

with the antagonism which had built up between it and the<br />

JIA and Progressive Jews in Britain.<br />

The fortunes of Jewish Continuity were inextricably<br />

linked with those of its progenitor, Rabbi Dr. Sacks. He appeared<br />

increasingly beleaguered by an intractable rabbinate,<br />

an assertive Jewish women’s movement and confident Masorti,<br />

Reform, and Progressive movements. <strong>In</strong> February 1993 a Jewish<br />

women’s prayer group held the first women’s Sabbath service<br />

in a manner authorized by Rabbi Dr. Sacks: in a private<br />

house and without use of a Sefer <strong>Torah</strong> or prayers requiring<br />

a male quorum. But there was pressure for more radical, and<br />

according to many authorities permissible, steps such as use<br />

of a Sefer <strong>Torah</strong> and praying in a synagogue. <strong>In</strong> March 1994, a<br />

women’s prayer group defied Rabbi Dr. Sacks and held a service<br />

using a Sefer <strong>Torah</strong> on a Sunday at Yakar, an independent<br />

Orthodox study center in London.<br />

<strong>In</strong> July 1993, Rabbi Dr. Sacks issued guidelines to the US<br />

on how to accommodate women’s demands for greater involvement.<br />

He ruled that women could become members of<br />

the US council and sit on synagogue boards of management,<br />

but only by co-option not election. This did not satisfy the<br />

women of the US. <strong>In</strong> October 1993, Rabbi Dr. Sacks announced<br />

his solution to the problem of agunot. He recommended mandatory<br />

prenuptial contracts entitling the wife to support from<br />

her husband until divorced by a get, and mutual cooperation<br />

to achieve that end. Enforcement of this recommendation was<br />

stymied by members of his Beth Din.<br />

The inquiry into women in the community, initiated by<br />

Rabbi Dr. Sacks and headed by Rosalind Preston, announced<br />

its findings in June 1994. It revealed that women wanted more<br />

spiritual involvement, more rituals in recognition of female<br />

life-cycle events, the right to say kaddish, greater recognition<br />

of the needs of single women and single mothers, urgent reform<br />

of the get system, and greater sensitivity by Batei Din to<br />

428 ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!