28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

family<br />

whether the daughter of the father or the mother, granddaughter<br />

– whether the daughter of a son or of a daughter, daughter<br />

of the wife of one’s father (bat-eshet av), the father’s sister, the<br />

mother’s sister, the father’s brother and his wife – the aunt (dodah),<br />

the son’s wife (kallah) – in biblical terms, the “bride” in<br />

relation to the parents of her husband, and the brother’s wife<br />

(eshet a). It was forbidden to take a woman and her daughter<br />

(Lev. 18:17; stated conversely, a woman and her mother, Lev.<br />

20:14) or granddaughter; likewise a man was prohibited from<br />

taking his wife’s sister (called ẓarah, a “rival”) while his wife<br />

was still alive (Lev. 18:18; contrast Jacob’s marriage to Leah<br />

and Rachel).<br />

FUNCTIONS OF FAMILY MEMBERS. The respective functions<br />

and status of these persons are reflected in scattered passages.<br />

The father was the head of the family unit and owner of its<br />

property (Num. 26:54–55). He was the chief authority and, as<br />

such, is portrayed as commanding (Gen. 50:16; Jer. 35:6–10;<br />

Prov. 6:20) and rebuking (Gen. 37:10; Num. 12:14). Ideally<br />

he was expected to be benevolent, to show love to his family<br />

(Gen. 25:28; 37:4; 44:20) and also pity (Ps. 103:13). The patriarchal<br />

blessing (Gen. 27) evidently carried legal force with<br />

regard to the distribution of the patrimony and other attendant<br />

privileges.<br />

The mother, if she were the senior wife of a harem or<br />

the sole wife of a monogamous marriage, occupied a place of<br />

honor and authority in spite of her subordination to her husband<br />

(see below). At his death she might become the actual,<br />

and probably the legal, head of the household (II Kings 8:1–6)<br />

if there were no sons of responsible age. As a widow, she was<br />

especially vulnerable to oppression; concern for her welfare<br />

was deemed a measure of good government and wholesome<br />

society (e.g., Deut. 24:17). The influence of famous mothers in<br />

epic tradition, e.g., Sarah (Gen. 21:12) and the wife of Manoah<br />

(Judg. 13:23), is illustrative of the significance attached to their<br />

role. Not all of their power was exercised openly; often the<br />

motherly stratagem is deemed worthy of special notice in the<br />

epic tradition, e.g., the stratagems of Rebekah (Gen. 27:5–17),<br />

Leah (Gen. 30:16), and Rachel (Gen. 31:34). The mother naturally<br />

displayed care and love (Gen. 25:28; Isa. 49:15; 66:13;<br />

Prov. 4:3).<br />

The role of the queen mother (gevirah) stands out in several<br />

instances (e.g., I Kings 2:19; 15:13; cf. II Chron. 15:16). The<br />

almost uniform practice of naming the mother of the newly<br />

crowned Judahite king (e.g., I Kings 14:21) may be a reflection<br />

of her special status, but not necessarily. The biblical narrative<br />

was evidently concerned with keeping track of the royal<br />

heirs by this means, perhaps in order to stress the particular<br />

family or region whose daughter had gained the distinction of<br />

having her son rise to the throne (cf. II Kings 21:19 and 23:36<br />

where the Galilean origin of the kings’ mothers is indicated).<br />

It is not certain that in every case the son of the chief wife<br />

gained the succession.<br />

The greatest misfortune that could befall a woman was<br />

childlessness (Gen. 30:23; I Sam. 1). Children were a blessing<br />

from the Almighty (Ps. 127:3–5); they assured the continuance<br />

of the family name (Num. 27:4, 8; 36:8b). The mother was<br />

more directly involved in the early training of the children<br />

than was the father (Prov. 1:8). When the children grew older,<br />

the father assumed responsibility for instructing the son (Gen.<br />

18:19; Ex. 12:26–27; 13:8, 14, 15; Deut. 6:7), while the mother<br />

evidently kept charge of the daughter until marriage (Micah<br />

7:6). Children were exhorted to honor both parents (Ex. 20:12;<br />

Deut. 5:16), and the inclusion of this command in the Decalogue<br />

probably accounts for the threatened death penalty to<br />

offenders (Ex. 21:15; Lev. 20:9; Deut. 27:16). The decline in respect<br />

for parents was symptomatic of the dissolution of society<br />

(Ezek. 22:7; Micah 7:6; Prov. 20:20). The demonstration of<br />

this respect was primarily through obedience (Gen. 28:7; Lev.<br />

19:3; Deut. 21:18–21; Prov. 1:8; 30:17). Parental control included<br />

the right to sell daughters in marriage, although there were<br />

limitations on selling her into slavery (Ex. 21:7–11; cf. 22:15–16;<br />

Neh. 5:5), and an absolute ban on selling her for prostitution<br />

(Lev. 19:29). The father could annul his daughter’s vows (Num.<br />

30:4–6), and damages were paid to him for a wrong done to<br />

her (Ex. 22:15–16; Deut. 22:28–29). A daughter who was widowed<br />

or divorced might return to her father’s household (Gen.<br />

38:11, Lev. 22:13; Ruth 1:15).<br />

The terms “brother” (aḥ) and “sister” (aḥot) applied both<br />

to offspring of the same father and mother (Gen. 4:2) as well<br />

as to offspring who had only one common parent, either a<br />

father (Gen. 20:12) or mother (Gen. 43:7; Lev. 18:9; 20:17).<br />

Attempts have been made to find traces of a fratriarchal system<br />

in the most ancient Israelite traditions; e.g., in Laban’s<br />

role (Gen. 24) as head of the family when his sister Rebekah<br />

was sent to marry Isaac. Laban’s role, however, can be explained<br />

without recourse to fratriarchy; Laban, as the direct<br />

descendant of Nahor (Gen. 24:15, 29; 29:5), certainly was<br />

slated to become head of the family after his own father’s<br />

demise. Another biblical incident, the concern of Jacob’s<br />

sons after the humiliation of their sister, whom they called<br />

their “daughter” (Gen. 34:17), can also be understood in this<br />

way.<br />

Brotherly solidarity is frequently stressed (e.g., Prov.<br />

17:17), and harmony among brothers was held up as an ideal<br />

(Ps. 133:1). Brothers were obligated to avenge each other’s<br />

murder (II Sam. 3:27) as part of their duty as go’el (“defender”<br />

or “redeemer”; Num. 35:19–28; Deut. 19:6; Josh. 20:3; II Sam.<br />

14:11). Another aspect of this responsibility was the requirement<br />

that one ransom a brother who had been taken captive<br />

or had gone into servitude as the result of financial adversity<br />

(Lev. 25:48; Ps. 49:8; cf. Neh. 5:8).<br />

The term “brother” is often extended to more distant relatives,<br />

e.g., nephews (e.g., Gen. 13:8; 14:14), fellow tribesmen<br />

(Lev. 21:10), and others (Deut. 2:4, 8; 23:8).<br />

Other members of the immediate family were the paternal<br />

uncle (dod; e.g., Lev. 10:4; 20:20) and the paternal aunt<br />

(dodah; the father’s sister, Ex. 6:20; and the wife of the father’s<br />

brother, Lev. 18:14; 20:20); also cousins (male, ben-dod, Lev.<br />

25:49; Num. 36:11; female, bat-dod, Esth. 2:7).<br />

692 ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!