28.05.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

embalming<br />

by any special individual, whether priest or king. <strong>In</strong> the Bible,<br />

Moses and Aaron have leading ritual roles, depending on the<br />

context, but the spring and fall festivals never specify the role<br />

of a priest, even in the Holiness and Priestly versions of Leviticus<br />

23 and Numbers 28–29. All the accounts of Israel’s primary<br />

festivals emphasize the gathering of the populace. At Emar, the<br />

most striking comparison again is found in the zukru, “given”<br />

by “the sons of the land of Emar” together and with feasting<br />

by “the people” as a whole. The feasting takes place outside the<br />

city walls, where all the gods of the town have gathered to witness<br />

Dagan’s procession between sacred stones. Although the<br />

king’s financial commitment to the festival is impressive, no<br />

ritual role is attributed to him. Likewise, the diviner is absent.<br />

Only the gods have individual roles, and we are never told who<br />

moves them or manipulates their statues. What is important<br />

is the participation of all the people and all their gods, the human<br />

and divine population of Emar. The same full participation<br />

characterizes the ideal of the <strong>Torah</strong> festivals.<br />

The continuities between the worlds of Emar and of<br />

the Bible have more to do with the structures of their societies.<br />

At the same time, the ritual calendar and emphasis on the<br />

collective at the ritual expense of the king, for example, are<br />

not universal Near Eastern traits. Somehow, both Ugarit and<br />

Emar show different expressions of a cultural kinship that<br />

reached north and south along the Mediterranean and inland.<br />

The overlapping preoccupations of <strong>Torah</strong> instruction and<br />

the Emar ritual texts allow glimpses of this common cultural<br />

foundation beneath the superstructures of their separate developments.<br />

These glimpses warn us neither to treat the Bible<br />

and its religion as a world unto itself nor to explain points of<br />

similarity by the notion of borrowing, especially by contacts<br />

with conquering Mesopotamian powers. Rather, these similarities<br />

are hints of a massive commonality, from which the<br />

distinct features of particular peoples developed. The commonality<br />

itself is not uniform across the ancient world, and<br />

the north-south axis is striking, even as lines of distinction<br />

will not often be sharp. Emar, like Ugarit and other Syrian<br />

sites with cuneiform archives from the Bronze Age, suggests<br />

a depth to the cultural traditions embedded in the Bible that<br />

is too easily neglected. Evaluation of the stories and the events<br />

they describe is a problem that requires other comparative<br />

evidence.<br />

Bibliography: M. Adamthwaite, Late Hittite Emar (2001); D.<br />

Arnaud, Recherches au pays d’Astata, Emar VI. 1–4 ( 1985–87); idem,<br />

Textes syriens de l’âge du Bronze Recent (1991); G. Beckman, Texts from<br />

the Vicinity of Emar in the Collection of Jonathan Rose. 1996; Z. Ben-<br />

Barak, in, M. Heltzer and E. Lipinski (ed.), Society and Economy in<br />

the Eastern Mediterranean (c. 1500–1000 B.C.) (1988), 87–97; D. Beyer,<br />

Emar IV. Les sceau. ( 2001); M. Chavalas, (ed.). Emar: The History, Religion,<br />

and Culture of a Syrian Town in the Late Bronze Age (1996); U.<br />

Finkbeiner, et al. in: Baghdader Mitteilungen, 32 (2001) 41–110; ibid,<br />

33 (2002), 109–46; ibid, 34 (2003) 9–100; D. Fleming, The <strong>In</strong>stallation<br />

of Baal’s High Priestess at Emar (1992); idem, in, Ugarit-Forschungen<br />

24 (1992) 59–71; idem, in, RB 106 (1999) 8–35; 161–74; idem; Time at<br />

Emar (2000); J.-C. Margueron, (ed.), Le Moyen-Euphrate (1980); Articles<br />

by Arnaud, Laroche, and Margueron; idem, in, BA, 58 (1995)<br />

126–38; E. Pentiuc, West Semitic Vocabulary in the Akkadian Texts<br />

from Emar (2001); R. Pruzsinszky, Die Personennamen der Texte aus<br />

Emar (2003); S. Stephano, L’accadico di Emar. (1998); A. Tsukimoto,<br />

in, Acta Sumerologica, 12 (1990) 177–259; (II), 13 (1991) 275–333; (III)<br />

14 (1992) 311–15; (IV) 16 (1994) 231–36; J. Westenholz, Cuneiform <strong>In</strong>scriptions<br />

in the Collection of the Bible Lands Museum: The Emar<br />

Tablets (2000).<br />

[Daniel Fleming (2 nd ed.)]<br />

EMBALMING. The natural drying out of the body by solar<br />

heat (mummification) is the oldest method of preserving<br />

a corpse. The ancient Egyptians may have simply tried to<br />

dry corpses in the hot desert sands, or as in one of the chambers<br />

found at Thebes, in rooms which were artificially heated.<br />

Embalming is the artificial treatment of a corpse to prevent<br />

or delay its putrefaction. <strong>In</strong> ancient Egypt the technique<br />

consisted, according to Herodotus, of using an iron hook<br />

to draw out the brain through the nostrils, and then making<br />

a cut along the flank to remove the abdominal contents,<br />

which were washed and soaked in palm wine and infusions<br />

of spices, and then stored in “canopic” jars. The heart, as seat<br />

of intelligence, was removed, wrapped in linen, and replaced<br />

into the chest cavity. The cavity was filled with myrrh, cassia,<br />

and other spices before being sewn up; the body was then<br />

washed and wrapped from head to foot in fine linen. The Bible<br />

describes embalmers as “physicians” (Gen. 50:2), and mentions<br />

it (perhaps to provide local color) only with reference to<br />

Jacob and Joseph (Gen. 50:2–3, 26), who both died in Egypt.<br />

The statement that the process required 40 days (Gen. 50:3)<br />

is at variance with Herodotus’ statement that it required 70,<br />

the period which the Bible assigns to the Egyptians’ mourning<br />

for Jacob. <strong>In</strong> actuality, the mummification process might range<br />

between 30 and 200 days. The strong belief in an afterlife was<br />

what made preservation of the body so important in Egypt, in<br />

marked contrast to the situation in ancient Israel.<br />

Today embalming before burial is widely practiced in the<br />

United States by undertakers, who inject a formalin solution<br />

into the blood vessels; but in Israel it is rare, being confined<br />

entirely to bodies being sent abroad for burial (in conformity<br />

with international regulations).<br />

Bibliography: H.E. Sigerist, A History of Medicine (1951),<br />

353–54; I. Thorwald, Science and Secrets of Early Medicine (1962), index.<br />

Add. Bibliography: L. Lesko, in: CANE III, 1764–66.<br />

[Heinrich Karplus]<br />

EMBDEN, GUSTAV (1874–1933), German biochemist. Born<br />

in Hamburg, Embden was appointed professor of physiology<br />

at Frankfurt University in 1914, where he carried on his productive<br />

investigations into the chemistry of muscular contraction.<br />

Recognizing that muscle glycogen is not directly<br />

oxidized for energy, he helped to elaborate the metabolic<br />

pathways by which carbohydrate is degraded within the cell.<br />

This biochemical pattern, which bears his name, is characteristic<br />

of most living cells. Embden also stressed the significance<br />

of phosphoric acid in the intracellular metabolism of<br />

sugars. Other research contributions were in the area of fat<br />

390 ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!