12.07.2015 Views

Effet chez le porcelet d'une exposition à un régime co-contaminé en ...

Effet chez le porcelet d'une exposition à un régime co-contaminé en ...

Effet chez le porcelet d'une exposition à un régime co-contaminé en ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTIONbetwe<strong>en</strong> AF and CPA on the body weight of animals was qualified as synergistic or additive (Pier etal., 1989; Smith et al., 1992).Biochemical and hematological alterations were also measured, and <strong>le</strong>ss than additive toantagonistic interaction betwe<strong>en</strong> AF and CPA were reported (Kumar and Balachandran, 2005;Morrissey et al., 1987; Smith et al., 1992) (Tab<strong>le</strong> 4). Similar types of interaction were noted onimm<strong>un</strong>e parameters, with especially an antagonism action of CPA on the depressant effect of AF oncell-mediated imm<strong>un</strong>ity (Pier et al., 1989) (Tab<strong>le</strong> 4). However, the author suggested that the reducednumbers of animals in the <strong>co</strong>mbination group, and that survivors had appar<strong>en</strong>tly greater resistanceto the toxins may have influ<strong>en</strong>ced the data obtained.Among these studies, a particular att<strong>en</strong>tion has be<strong>en</strong> paid on micros<strong>co</strong>pic <strong>le</strong>sions. Wh<strong>en</strong> rats wereshortly exposed to the my<strong>co</strong>toxins, <strong>le</strong>ss than additive or antagonistic interaction betwe<strong>en</strong> the twotoxins were described for the incid<strong>en</strong>ce in liver <strong>le</strong>sions (Morrissey et al., 1987) (Tab<strong>le</strong> 4). Conversely,wh<strong>en</strong> animals were exposed for a longer period to these toxins, the interaction was suggested to beadditive in liver <strong>le</strong>sions, characterized by a marked cytoplasmic vacuolation (Kumar andBalachandran, 2009; Pier et al., 1989). Likewise, this greater effect was noticed in the severity andincid<strong>en</strong>ce of kidney <strong>le</strong>sions in broi<strong>le</strong>r chick<strong>en</strong>s (Kumar and Balachandran, 2009), and in<strong>co</strong>nsist<strong>en</strong>tly inrats, dep<strong>en</strong>ding on the ratio of my<strong>co</strong>toxins used (Morrissey et al., 1987) (Tab<strong>le</strong> 4). Of note, <strong>le</strong>sionsre<strong>co</strong>rded in gizzard, crop and prov<strong>en</strong>triculus suggested adverse effects on the digestive tract; theinteraction <strong>le</strong>ading either to additive (Kumar and Balachandran, 2009) or <strong>le</strong>ss than additive effects(Smith et al., 1992).4.2) Interaction betwe<strong>en</strong> Aflatoxins (AF) and - Moniliformin (MON), - Sterigmatocystin (STER), -Citrinin (CIT), - Rubratoxin (RUB)In order to a give <strong>co</strong>mp<strong>le</strong>te picture of the published literature, we should m<strong>en</strong>tion that one studyhave investigated the <strong>co</strong>mbined effect of AF and moniliformin on chick<strong>en</strong> (Kub<strong>en</strong>a et al., 1997c),another one the <strong>co</strong>mbined effect of AF and sterigmatocystin on guinea pig (Richard et al., 1978), anda third one the <strong>co</strong>mbined effect of aflatoxin and citrinin on chick<strong>en</strong> (Ahamad et al., 2006). The<strong>co</strong>mbined effect of AF and rubratoxin has also be<strong>en</strong> investigated (Hayes et al., 1977; Thurston et al.,1989; Wyatt et al., 1973). The parameters measured and the type of interaction observed betwe<strong>en</strong>AF and MON, STER, CIT and RUB are summarized in Tab<strong>le</strong> 4.34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!