Effet chez le porcelet d'une exposition à un régime co-contaminé en ...
Effet chez le porcelet d'une exposition à un régime co-contaminé en ...
Effet chez le porcelet d'une exposition à un régime co-contaminé en ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INTRODUCTIONexposed group (Brown et al., 1986; Manning et al., 1985) or <strong>le</strong>ss severe than the ones observed inthe animal group receiving the highest dose of CIT alone (Kitch<strong>en</strong> et al., 1977b).An increased g<strong>en</strong>otoxicity of OTA was also observed in the pres<strong>en</strong>ce of CIT, with increased DNAadductsin kidney, suggesting synergism (Pfohl-Leszkowicz et al., 2008) (Tab<strong>le</strong> 6).Two studies investigated the interaction betwe<strong>en</strong> OTA and CIT on the teratog<strong>en</strong>esis and <strong>le</strong>d todiffer<strong>en</strong>t results. Mayura et al. (1984) observed synergism betwe<strong>en</strong> the toxins wh<strong>en</strong> looking at fetalmalformations in rats (Tab<strong>le</strong> 6). By <strong>co</strong>ntrast, Vesela et al. (1983) observed the same teratog<strong>en</strong>iceffects in chick<strong>en</strong> embryos exposed to either OTA alone or OTA+CIT.2) Interaction betwe<strong>en</strong> OTA and Fusariotoxins2.1) Interaction betwe<strong>en</strong> OTA and TCT2.1.1) with TCT type AFive studies focused on the interaction betwe<strong>en</strong> OTA and T-2 toxin (Garcia et al., 2003; Harvey etal., 1994; Kub<strong>en</strong>a et al., 1989a; Raju and Devegowda, 2000; 2002) (Tab<strong>le</strong> 6).Except the study of Raju and Devegowda (2000), the experim<strong>en</strong>ts showed that the association ofOTA and T-2 toxin act in an additive manner to depress the body weight gain (Tab<strong>le</strong> 6). The serum<strong>co</strong>nc<strong>en</strong>trations of albumin, creatinine, cho<strong>le</strong>sterol, uric acid and phosphorus were affected in thesestudies, repres<strong>en</strong>ting mostly the effect of OTA alone, but <strong>le</strong>ss than additive or antagonisticinteractions were reported. These studies noted an additive interaction on the decreasedhemoglobin <strong>co</strong>nc<strong>en</strong>tration. Effect of both OTA and T-2 toxin ingestion on <strong>en</strong>zyme <strong>co</strong>nc<strong>en</strong>trationsinduced differ<strong>en</strong>t type of interactions betwe<strong>en</strong> these studies, but in most of the case a significantdecrease was reported (Tab<strong>le</strong> 6). It was suggested that the property to inhibit the protein synthesisby these my<strong>co</strong>toxins was involved.It seems from these studies that T-2 toxin may interfere in the OTA-induced r<strong>en</strong>al impairm<strong>en</strong>t, asshown by the antagonistic interaction on the RW-K, uric acid, phosphorus or also the perc<strong>en</strong>tage ofnecrotic tubular cells (Tab<strong>le</strong> 6). Nonethe<strong>le</strong>ss, micros<strong>co</strong>pic <strong>le</strong>sions showing deg<strong>en</strong>erative changes inr<strong>en</strong>al tubular epithelium and proximal <strong>co</strong>nvoluted tubu<strong>le</strong>s were similarly reported for OTA andOTA+T2 groups (Harvey et al., 1994; Kub<strong>en</strong>a et al., 1989a). In liver, T-2 toxin appeared to slightlypot<strong>en</strong>tiate the hepatotoxicity of OTA, visib<strong>le</strong> on the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of repairing tissue (Garcia et al.,2003) (Tab<strong>le</strong> 6).Finally, their interaction on imm<strong>un</strong>e system was reported by Harvey et al. (1994) and Raju andDevegowda (2002). Although an additive effect was observed on the lymphocytes proliferation upon42