12.07.2015 Views

Effet chez le porcelet d'une exposition à un régime co-contaminé en ...

Effet chez le porcelet d'une exposition à un régime co-contaminé en ...

Effet chez le porcelet d'une exposition à un régime co-contaminé en ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTIONon cell tissue cultures, on mice, on rats and on swine (Lu et al., 1997; Liu et al., 2001; Fernandez-Surumay et al., 2004). The products of FB1-reducing sugar reaction were characterized as N-(carboxymethyl) FB1, N-(1-deoxy-d-fructos-1-yl) FB1, N-methyl-FB1, N-(3-hydroxyacetonyl) FB1, andN-(2-hydroxy-2-carboxyethyl) FB1. In 2005, Fernandez-Surumay et al. examined the effects offumonisin B-glu<strong>co</strong>se reaction products in swine fed with treated maize (see Tab<strong>le</strong> 7). The authorsuggested that dietary FB1-glu<strong>co</strong>se might provide a detoxification approach in instances ofwidespread fumonisins grain <strong>co</strong>ntamination.7) Citric acidUp to 96% degradation of aflatoxin B1 occurred in maize <strong>co</strong>ntaminated with 93 ppb wh<strong>en</strong> treatedwith an aqueous citric acid (M<strong>en</strong>dez-Albores et al., 2005). In addition, they evaluated the toxicity ofacidified samp<strong>le</strong>s obtained in a bioassay (see Tab<strong>le</strong> 7). These results show the efficacy and safety ofthe acidification procedure in reducing aflatoxins <strong>le</strong>vels in maize. The author suggested also that forwho<strong>le</strong> grain, it is likely that acid treatm<strong>en</strong>t may be <strong>le</strong>ss effective than for gro<strong>un</strong>d maize, since toxinsdeposited inside who<strong>le</strong> kernels are <strong>le</strong>ss likely to be exposed to acidic treatm<strong>en</strong>t than toxins in smallmaize partic<strong>le</strong>s. Toxicity of <strong>un</strong>treated aflatoxin-<strong>co</strong>ntaminated feed was reduced in ducks wh<strong>en</strong>aqueous citric acid was applied to feed (M<strong>en</strong>dez-Albores et al., 2007; see Tab<strong>le</strong> 7).8) Other chemical treatm<strong>en</strong>tsA <strong>co</strong>mp<strong>le</strong>te destruction of deoxyniva<strong>le</strong>nol was reported in <strong>co</strong>rn <strong>co</strong>ntaminated with 1000 ppm ofDON, treated with 30% chlorine (v/v) for 30 min (Yo<strong>un</strong>g, 1986). The author suggested that thetreatm<strong>en</strong>t might be too drastic for grains destined for human <strong>co</strong>nsumption but <strong>co</strong>uld be used inanimal feed production.Calcium hydroxide monomethylamine has be<strong>en</strong> used successfully to de<strong>co</strong>ntaminate T-2 and HT-2toxin in maize (Bauer, 1994).Butylated hydroxytolu<strong>en</strong>e (BHT) treatm<strong>en</strong>t significantly reduced the hepatocellular necrosis,biliary hyperplasia, and e<strong>le</strong>vated serum <strong>en</strong>zymes <strong>co</strong>mmonly caused by aflatoxin B1 in turkeys. Thisdiminished pathology demonstrates a physiologic protective effect (Coulombe et al., 2005). Theseresults were supported by the fact that dietary BHT can cause significant reductions in AFB1bioavailability, AFB1-DNA adduct formation in the liver, and reduced AFB1 residues in tissues(Guaris<strong>co</strong> et al., 2008).66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!