10.04.2013 Views

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The dangers of unilateralism were also highlighted by former UK Foreign Secretary<br />

Robin Cook in explaining his resignation from the Cabinet * in protest at the UK<br />

Government’s decision to join the US in taking military action against Iraq in 2003<br />

without the backing of an explicit UN mandate (the so-called ‘Second Resolution’):<br />

The reality is that Britain is being asked to embark on a war without agreement<br />

in any of the international bodies of which we are a leading partner – not NATO,<br />

not the European Union and, now, not the Security Council.<br />

…Our interests are best protected not by unilateral action but by multilateral<br />

agreements and a world order governed by rules. 117<br />

In particular, Cook pointed to the damage that had been done to the informal coalition<br />

of consensus in tackling the threat of international terrorism, which had coalesced so<br />

quickly after the devastating attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York and on the<br />

Pentagon on 11 Sep 2001. He said: ‘Only a year ago, we and the United States were<br />

part of a coalition against terrorism that was wider and more diverse than I would ever<br />

have imagined possible.’ 118 Lack of clear and widely perceived justification, then, had<br />

shattered the consensus – across a broad geographic and cultural spread – that was<br />

essential in the fight against international terrorism. This theme was followed eighteen<br />

months later as controversy over the war continued unabated and Iraq, liberated from<br />

the Saddam regime, remained in turmoil and an apparent centre of gravity for anti-<br />

Western terrorism. In an interview with The Daily Telegraph Saudi Ambassador to<br />

London, Prince Turki al-Faisal, argued ‘(t)here is no doubt that as a result of the Iraq<br />

war it is easier for al-Qa’eda to sell their point of view to potential recruits. Al-Qa’eda<br />

has become stronger and more active since the Iraq conflict.’ 119 Of course, the<br />

increased al-Qa’eda activity may have occurred regardless of the justification, or<br />

perceived justification, of the conflict. It is the ability of the organisation to ‘sell their<br />

point of view’ that resulted from the widespread perception, most especially among al-<br />

Qa’eda’s natural recruit population of young Arabs, of the war’s lack of justification. In<br />

September 2004 British newspapers reported similar views expressed by the UK<br />

Ambassador to Rome, Sir Ivor Roberts. According to The Guardian, Sir Ivor<br />

‘described President George Bush as “the best recruiting sergeant ever for al-Qaida”’ 120<br />

* He was no longer Foreign Secretary at the time but held the Cabinet-ranked post of Leader of the House<br />

of Commons.<br />

104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!