CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CONTENTS
Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………... i
Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………… iii
Contents ………………………………………………………………………………... v
List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………….. v
List of Tables ………………………………………………………………………..… vi
List of Video Clips
Glossary of Acronyms ………………………………………………………………... vii
CHAPTER 1 : JUST WAR IN CONTEXT..................................................................... 1
1.1 Conceptual Framework........................................................................................... 1
1.2 Historical Context: The Origins and Development of Just War Doctrine ............ 43
1.3 Summary............................................................................................................... 57
CHAPTER 2 : THE REQUIREMENT FOR ETHICAL JUSTIFICATION................. 65
2.1 Introduction........................................................................................................... 65
2.2 Why a Return to Ethics: The Legalist Paradigm Challenged ............................... 66
2.3 Why Justification? .............................................................................................. 101
2.4 Summary............................................................................................................. 150
CHAPTER 3 : FUTURE CONFLICT AND ISSUES OF JUS AD BELLUM............ 163
3.1 Introductory Comments ...................................................................................... 163
3.2 Future War .......................................................................................................... 163
3.3 Humanitarian Intervention.................................................................................. 176
3.4 Preventive and Pre-emptive action..................................................................... 221
3.5 Summary............................................................................................................. 237
CHAPTER 4 : ISSUES OF JUS IN BELLO................................................................ 247
4.1 Introductory Comments ...................................................................................... 247
4.2 Issues of Jus in Bello 1: How the West Wages War........................................... 248
4.3 Issues of Jus in Bello 2: Responding to How the West’s Enemies Wage War
(‘Asymmetric’ War) ................................................................................................. 284
4.4 New Protagonists: Challenges to the Warrior Code........................................... 301
4.5 Summary............................................................................................................. 310
CHAPTER 5 : CONCLUSION .................................................................................... 319
GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHY..................................................................................... 329
List of Figures:
Figure 1-1: Three Traditions........................................................................................... 28
Figure 1-2 Militarism and Pacifism within the Three Traditions .................................. 34
Figure 2-1: Hooded Iraqi Prisoner attached to mock electrodes .................................. 110
Figure 2-2 PFC Lynndie England with leashed Iraqi prisoner ..................................... 110
Figure 2-3: Respect Part Campaign Card ..................................................................... 125
Figure 2-4 The HERO Model....................................................................................... 139
Figure 2-5 Military Effectiveness as Understood by British Military Doctrine........... 144
Figure 3-1 Competing Conceptualizations of the Place of the Individual in Rights-
Systems. ................................................................................................................ 203
Figure 3-2 Holliday's Restructuring of Jus ad Bellum................................................. 205
Figure 3-3 International Consensus versus Urgency When Determining Legitimacy of
Intervention........................................................................................................... 217
v