10.04.2013 Views

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2.3 Practical Failings<br />

Other failings of the UN paradigm are not so much structural – built-in to the paradigm,<br />

as is the veto – but practical, resulting from how the paradigm has developed in fact,<br />

been interpreted or ignored. This section will examine these areas of failure in practice.<br />

2.2.3.1 Failure to Institute the Envisioned Mechanism for Enforcement<br />

There are two particularly striking ways in which international law differs from<br />

domestic law. Firstly it lacks an effective enforcement mechanism. Secondly,<br />

submission to it is, in every important respect, voluntary. This will be evident from the<br />

examples considered below when looking at the lack of faith in institutions for peaceful<br />

dispute resolution. With the experience of the League of Nations era to draw upon, the<br />

founding fathers of the UN sought from the outset to address the first of these issues by<br />

establishing effective military forces to be placed at the organisation’s disposal.<br />

In Chapter One it was shown that part of just war reasoning of states’ rights to use force<br />

was the lack of higher authority to which disputes could be referred for resolution. (See<br />

p46). The UN system seeks to remove the right of states to use force (with certain, very<br />

restricted, exceptions as has been shown above) and to reserve that right to itself. This<br />

can only work in practice if the UN has at its disposal the instruments to wield that<br />

force. It was therefore envisaged at the organisation’s founding that it should indeed<br />

have such instruments available to it. The principles of states making troops and bases<br />

available to the Security Council and handing control of those troops to a Military Staff<br />

Committee composed of the Chiefs of Staff of the Permanent Five, met with little<br />

controversy at the founding conference. 55 Thus, Article 43 states:<br />

1. All Members of the United Nations …… undertake to make available to the<br />

Security Council …… in accordance with special agreement or agreements,<br />

armed forces, assistance, and facilities …… necessary for the purpose of<br />

maintaining international peace and security.<br />

2. Such agreement or agreements shall govern the numbers and types of forces,<br />

their degree of readiness and general location, and the nature of the facilities<br />

and assistance to be provided.<br />

3. Such agreement or agreements shall be negotiated as soon as possible on the<br />

initiative of the Security Council. They shall be concluded between the<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!