10.04.2013 Views

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.3 Humanitarian Intervention<br />

3.3.1 The Legal Stay to Intervention<br />

Just war doctrine offers no stay on intervention per se but, as Chapter 1 has shown, it<br />

has been adapted over time gradually to place ever greater restriction on a state’s jus ad<br />

bellum until replaced by a legal code that very clearly prohibits intervention in all but<br />

the most limited circumstances. International norms on use of force have developed<br />

from the traditional Christian understanding of just war, as encapsulated in the work of<br />

Augustine and Aquinas, to what Walzer (and others) have termed the legalist paradigm * .<br />

In outline this states that 44 :<br />

1. There exists a society of independent states. …….<br />

2. This international society has a law that establishes the rights of its members<br />

– above all, the rights of territorial integrity and political sovereignty. …. ….<br />

3. Any use of force or imminent threat of force by one state against the political<br />

sovereignty or territorial integrity of another constitutes aggression and is a<br />

criminal act. ….. …..<br />

4. Aggression justifies two kinds of response: a war of self defence by the<br />

victim and a war of law-enforcement by the victim and any other member of<br />

international society. …. ….<br />

5. Nothing but aggression can justify war. …. ….<br />

6. Once the aggressor state has been militarily repulsed, it can also be<br />

punished. …. ….<br />

This ethic has been codified most clearly in the Charter of the United Nations: ‘All<br />

members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force<br />

against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other<br />

manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations’ 45 (emphasis added).<br />

Furthermore, ‘Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United<br />

Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of<br />

any state….’ 46 Should clarification be necessary then it is to be found in General<br />

Assembly Resolution 2131 (XX): ‘… armed intervention and all forms of interference<br />

or attempted threats against the personality of the State or against its political, economic<br />

and cultural elements, are condemned.’ 47<br />

* Walzer concedes that the legalist paradigm as a basic statement of the theory of aggression is<br />

incomplete.<br />

176

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!