10.04.2013 Views

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Experience in Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan suggests that however we might minimise<br />

our own casualties, use of force is seldom ‘clean’ for all sides and an issue we must<br />

consider is the extent to which our chosen methods transfer risk not only to the enemy<br />

(which in war, is fair enough) but to the innocent civilian population.<br />

A feature of modern professional armies in the West today is the clear articulation of an<br />

ethos that encapsulates a code of conduct, with roots in much older concepts, that may<br />

be termed ‘warriors’ honour’. Aspects of the sort of conflict being faced today may<br />

present that with some challenges. In the context of how the West wages war there is a<br />

rapidly developing trend towards ‘outsourcing’ swathes of military capability to the<br />

private sector, with a consequent growth in the number and role of PMCs. This is not<br />

free from moral consequence, in particular, it will be argued, in that it adds to the<br />

battlefield protagonists who may not be party to the warrior code, or share with<br />

professional soldiers the same imperative for jus in bello.<br />

4.2.1 Risk/Casualty/Cost Aversion<br />

Minimising the costs associated with conflict – lives, treasure and political capital – is a<br />

natural and proper function for any government considering commitment of military<br />

forces. However, it is also important that the moral consequences of a decision not to<br />

invest any of these things, or to invest too little, is understood and included in the<br />

investment cost-benefit analysis. In particular a decision to commit to conflict must be<br />

accompanied by an understanding of the inevitability of casualties.<br />

Casualty-aversion has been identified as a characteristic of the Western approach to war<br />

particularly in the two decades since the end of the Cold War, though as a phenomenon<br />

especially associated with the US military it is often attributed to a political and military<br />

leadership shaped by the experience of Vietnam. This aversion is perhaps more fairly<br />

seen not as reluctance to accept the inevitability of casualties at all but rather as a<br />

reaction to what was seen as needless waste. Charles Dunlap, for example, suggests<br />

that ‘(s)ome of the impetus for casualty aversion arises from within the armed forces<br />

and originates in the military’s Vietnam legacy. Many in uniform believe that lives<br />

252

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!