10.04.2013 Views

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As a side-issue, but closely related to this, it is worth considering the impact on<br />

American preparedness to take the lead in future; the difficulties encountered as a result<br />

of the Iraq war – internationally but also domestically – not to mention the cost, both<br />

material and in US lives, might risk a US return to relative isolationism which could be<br />

as disadvantageous to the world as US unilateralism. Matthew Parris suggests that<br />

wrongful intervention<br />

has besmirched, by misapplication, a decent philosophy of muscular great-power<br />

diplomacy of which the civilised world may have future need. … …<br />

The horrors and mistakes of the First World War contributed mightily to the<br />

reluctance to fight another, feeding the mood for appeasement. The shame of<br />

the Holocaust may have dulled moral sensibilities to the mistakes Israel is<br />

making in the Middle East. The collapse of America’s calamitous engagement<br />

in Vietnam frightened a generation in the West off the more interfering approach<br />

we should have taken to sinister or corrupt forces developing in the Third<br />

World. 153<br />

In this context it is worth pondering whether, had the Iraq war not taken place, Western<br />

nations might have felt more minded to intervene to prevent what the US recognised as<br />

genocide in Darfur in 2004. 154*<br />

The final issue to consider, from the international perspective, is that of hegemonic<br />

leadership. It was suggested in Chapter 1 (see p58) that it pays any hegemon, however<br />

powerful, to act in such a way as to minimise challenges to his hegemony. For, as the<br />

Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci noted, the distinction between hegemony and<br />

domination is that the former is based on consent and the latter on coercion. 155 G John<br />

Ikenberry notes:<br />

The Bush Administration’s war on terrorism, invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq,<br />

expanded military budget, and controversial 2002 National Security Strategy<br />

have thrust American power into the light of day – and, in doing so, deeply<br />

unsettled much of the world.<br />

… …<br />

Power is often muted or disguised, but when it is exposed and perceived as<br />

domination, it inevitably invites response. 156<br />

* A fuller discussion on humanitarian intervention is undertaken in Chapter 3.<br />

116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!