10.04.2013 Views

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

number of them have some difficulty in being just an arm of the Government’s<br />

foreign policy. 206<br />

For others it will be pressure from their families, or from their employers 207 or simply<br />

the inability to reconcile the demands of called-up reserve service with sustaining a<br />

civilian career. Nevertheless, it seems reasonable to argue that such strain, and the<br />

impact on retention and recruiting, was exacerbated by a lack of public support for the<br />

war. Nor was this an issue just for the UK. America’s reserve force recruiting suffered<br />

too, despite the attractiveness of the package offered to reservists in terms of medical<br />

care (in perpetuity) and college funding. 208<br />

The UK’s Adjutant General, Sir Alistair Irwin, has also emphasised the importance of<br />

proper conduct in war – addressing in particular counter-terrorist wars where the enemy<br />

may be seen to enjoy the advantage of what Irwin terms ‘moral asymmetry’ 209 ; that is to<br />

say that the enemy is able to act without regard to either the legal or moral rules that are<br />

binding his opponent.<br />

(D)emocracies are expected to behave in a way that is entirely consistent with<br />

the law. * …..The opprobrium that attaches to national institutions that act<br />

illegally is infinitely greater than anything that attaches to the terrorist<br />

themselves. …. …. An untrue statement by those defending a democracy is<br />

castigated – because democracies are expected to tell the truth.<br />

General Irwin identifies four reasons why democracies must remain ‘on the right side of<br />

the law; on the right side of what is right and what is wrong’. Two – common<br />

humanity, and the continued pride of those engaged – act primarily at the individual<br />

level and will be considered in the next section. His other two reasons are the<br />

practicality of avoiding unintended long-term consequences, and operating in an<br />

environment of continued scrutiny by ‘an army of organisations and bodies prowling<br />

the touchline watching for every infringement of the rules.’ 210 Considering long-term<br />

unintended consequences the General notes that ‘we can all call quickly to mind the<br />

counter-productive effects of engaging in illegal acts, especially those that involve<br />

excessive violence.’ This issue was looked at above in respect of the international<br />

consequences (see p109 et seq) but is equally valid here.<br />

* And, one might add, consistent with the norms of international society (See Section 1.1.3)<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!