10.04.2013 Views

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

enter voluntarily. Until such a condition is attained, some level of conflict is inevitable.<br />

The liberal agenda seeks to overcome this natural state. Conduct of such wars, then,<br />

must be such as to avoid destruction of the basis of trust upon which peace must<br />

eventually be re-established. Liberalism is distinctively normative and therefore<br />

amenable to moral guidance on the use of force.<br />

Although a broad church, liberalism per se is not opposed to the use of force; indeed<br />

certain strands within it may prove more prone to using force than are realists. At one<br />

end of its spectrum it encompasses or at least tends towards pacifism, which would<br />

condemn just war for seeking to vindicate the unacceptable. At the other end, however,<br />

it displays a tendency to moral-crusading in its interventionism. Here just war might<br />

offer the very framework for debate that is required to avoid hubris and unrestrained use<br />

of force to impose values assumed to be universal.<br />

International Society shares the liberal view that the interaction of states is primarily a<br />

human business; as such it falls within the realm of ethics. The interaction of states<br />

necessarily leads to the development of a ‘society’ with norms and conventions, if not<br />

necessarily formal rules. International Societists share with realists a view that war is<br />

inevitable but reject the realists assertion that it is beyond moral regulation.<br />

Just war has a natural appeal to International Society, which accepts the inevitability of<br />

war but seeks to minimise both its incidence and effect. The society of states depends<br />

for its existence on a minimum set of shared principles to which members feel able to<br />

subscribe; these must have broad appeal. The occasion on which armed force may<br />

legitimately be used, and the ways in which it may be used, are surely significant<br />

enough to be strong contenders for inclusion in this rule-set.<br />

5.2 Conclusion 2: The Establishment of a Legal Paradigm for Use of Force<br />

Effectively Rendered Just War Doctrine Obsolete<br />

320

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!