10.04.2013 Views

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

… I suppose American power is more respected ….. but then you have to count<br />

against that, first of all, the loss of life…(and) continued costs -- they're<br />

escalating, both in blood and money. But above all else, the loss of American<br />

credibility, both at home and abroad, is something that's very serious. The fact<br />

that the President of the United States is no longer trusted and his word is<br />

not taken to be America's bond is a serious development. It detracts from our<br />

power.<br />

… ….<br />

You cannot be leading if you are misleading. And that is just a fact of life.<br />

Democracy is based on trust, on the covenant between the people and the<br />

president. An international alliance of democracies is based on trust.<br />

… …<br />

The fact is that our credibility has been hurt. 158 (Emphasis added)<br />

Credibility and trust matter in confirming the leadership of a hegemon. Returning to the<br />

issues of legitimacy and soft power in ensuring unchallenged leadership, Joseph Nye<br />

argues that whilst the first Gulf War was widely regarded as legitimate, the more recent<br />

one was contested.<br />

Unable to balance American military power, France, Germany, Russia, and<br />

China created a coalition to balance American soft power by depriving the<br />

United States of the legitimacy that might have been bestowed by a second UN<br />

resolution. Although such balancing did not avert the war in Iraq, it did<br />

significantly raise its price. 159<br />

Because Turkey did not recognize the war as legitimate it refused to facilitate an<br />

invasion from the North, through its territory, which impacted on US ability to wield its<br />

hard (military power). Of course, Turkey had another key motive, in the Kurdish<br />

question, but this notwithstanding it is difficult to imagine Turkey so robustly<br />

challenging US hegemony, had there been more widespread, and especially NATO and<br />

European, support for the US position. A failure of credibility and legitimacy, then,<br />

detracted from hegemonic leadership. It is worth noting here, that legitimacy can be<br />

damaged, if not destroyed, by a challenge alone – regardless of the validity of the<br />

challenge, or legitimacy of the challenger(s); it is the challenge, not the source, that<br />

matters. 160<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!