10.04.2013 Views

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

operation around Fallujah, a political storm broke in the UK, in part because of a<br />

perceived link to the US Presidential election and in part because the dangers the battle-<br />

group was expected to face in the new area of operations were considered to have been<br />

heightened by the US approach to peacekeeping. The following quotations represent<br />

concerns expressed to the Defence Secretary by MPs on both sides of the House of<br />

Commons 129 :<br />

Joan Ruddock (Lewisham, Deptford) (Lab): Will my right hon. Friend accept<br />

that there is a clear perception—among those, such as me, who opposed the war<br />

and those who supported it—that British troops have been more intelligently and<br />

sensitively led in Iraq than the US forces? At a time when two thirds of Iraqi<br />

civilians who are killed die at the hands of the coalition, is not this the time to<br />

review the conduct of the war rather than to place British forces, which have<br />

done a fantastic job in their own way, under the command of the US?<br />

Mr. Iain Duncan Smith (Chingford and Woodford Green) (Con): I am one<br />

of those who continue to support the war ……. Will the Secretary of State<br />

explain how our different approach will not end up creating huge problems for<br />

us in the conduct of operations under the command, or associated command, of<br />

the Americans?<br />

Mr. Robin Cook (Livingston) (Lab): Will my right hon. Friend confirm that it<br />

is the restraint that has been shown by British troops in peacekeeping that has<br />

earned them respect among the Iraqis? Will it really be possible for them to<br />

maintain that restraint if they are deployed to a US sector that has been policed<br />

for more than a year by US forces who have not shown the same level of<br />

restraint? Does my right hon. Friend recall that the last time US forces besieged<br />

Falluja, they left Iraq in uproar over the many civilian casualties? In assessing<br />

the request, will he consider carefully the risk to British troops, in that if they<br />

free up US forces for the next attack they may be seen by some Iraqis as equally<br />

responsible for civilian casualties over which neither he nor they will have any<br />

control whatever?<br />

Mr. Kenneth Clarke (Rushcliffe) (Con): Does the Secretary of State accept<br />

that the difference between the British and American approaches to<br />

peacekeeping is not just a question of defending themselves against attack—<br />

British troops are just as robust in defending themselves against direct attack as<br />

any of their allies—but involves an approach to peacekeeping based on trying to<br />

keep the support of all the favourably disposed, non-insurgent civilian<br />

population? As the latest deployment is plainly intended to facilitate a further<br />

assault on Falluja, will the Government take the opportunity to try to exercise<br />

more influence on the Americans in their conduct of operations? In particular,<br />

will they stress the need to ensure that the force used is proportionate to the<br />

threat that is definitely known, and that action is conducted on a basis that<br />

minimises the threat to civilians and reduces the amount of air and artillery<br />

attack on densely populated areas of a city?<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!