10.04.2013 Views

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Of course, this conceptualization of just cause, opens wide debate as to the nature of<br />

justice, as Holliday himself recognises: ‘Given the enormous amount of Western debate<br />

prompted by Rawls’ publication of A Theory of Justice in 1971, and the jihad versus<br />

McWorld ideological contests that have developed across the globe more recently, it is<br />

only to be expected that a wide range of perspectives will be confronted at this point.’ 134<br />

We need not be too alarmed that Holliday’s formulation would open the way for too<br />

many interventions because the other conditions – last resort and proportionality, in<br />

particular – provide the stay. Nevertheless, we might choose to further constrain the<br />

just cause by incorporating into Holliday the restriction discussed earlier to cases of<br />

injustice that ‘shock the conscience of mankind’. We are then presented with a<br />

formulation of just cause for humanitarian intervention thus: There exists an intractable<br />

injustice so grievous as to shock the conscience of mankind and this can only be halted<br />

by the use of military force; the proposed intervention has the authority of a legitimate<br />

body and the intentions of the intervening powers are (demonstrably) right; there is a<br />

reasonable chance of success and the use of military action (and its intended scale) is<br />

proportionate to the injustice to be addressed. Before we can accept this, we must give<br />

further consideration to the right intent, reasonable chance of success and legitimate<br />

authority conditions.<br />

Before leaving this discussion of just cause, it is worth noting that in the contemporary<br />

security environment, in which security clearly involves much more than territorial<br />

defence, there may well be self defence justifications for intervention. The issue of<br />

whether such interventions can be pre-emptive/preventive is discussed below and the<br />

possible need for interventionist action in combating terrorism and wider asymmetric<br />

warfare will be discussed in the next chapter.<br />

3.3.4.2 Right Intent and Reasonable Chance of Success in Humanitarian<br />

Intervention<br />

Holliday’s reformulation of just cause goes some way to removing the subjectivity of<br />

the judgement that has always been a difficulty for discussion of jus ad bellum – by<br />

206

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!