10.04.2013 Views

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The US assault on Fallujah received a uniformly bad press in Europe. What was<br />

drowned out in the torrent of abuse was the abundant evidence (credible to this<br />

potential critic) found of the presence of ‘foreign fighters’, the use of mosques<br />

for the storage of weapons, ammunition and explosives, the torture and murder<br />

of hostages .... 116<br />

Regular forces that are the targets of irregulars – terrorists, guerrillas or partisans – then<br />

face the moral difficulty of distinguishing friend – or more likely neutral – from foe.<br />

There is also the simple fact that in this form of warfare the military are brought into<br />

greater contact with non-combatants – ‘enemy’, neutral, friend, or most likely a mixture<br />

of all three – than they are in conventional conflict. This may be one reason why we<br />

find more numerous incidents of alleged mistreatment. It was an attempt to remove this<br />

civilian ‘terrain’ from the equation that led to Britain’s misguided – and ultimately<br />

disastrously inhumane – introduction of ‘concentration’ camps in the Boer War. In<br />

fact, proper engagement with the civilian population is a key activity in countering<br />

asymmetric warfare.<br />

Furthermore, the lack of distinction between acts of war and acts of crime means that<br />

military forces find themselves not only engaged in traditional and non-traditional<br />

combat operations but needing, too, to deal with organised crime, drug production and<br />

transportation, and human-trafficking. The nature of contemporary security challenges,<br />

much wider than traditional defence issues, will result in a need ‘to collaborate not only<br />

with forces from other countries but also with civilian, non-governmental relief<br />

providers.’ 117 Much of this is new territory for military forces and beyond their<br />

traditional training and moral mind-set.<br />

The omnipresent nature of the media adds further to this dimension. The ability of non-<br />

state actors to influence the decision-making process in democratic states, particularly,<br />

through media impact on public opinion, plays a key role in the development of<br />

asymmetric warfare. The so-called ‘Mogadishu-effect’ after the US withdrawal from<br />

Somalia following the very public and brutal killing of eighteen US soldiers in 1993 118<br />

is a glaring example of the West’s potential vulnerability to this. Instead of traditional<br />

war reporting we have a reporting war 119 which provokes and promotes the use of media<br />

events such as hostage-taking and highly stage-managed executions such as those seen<br />

289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!