10.04.2013 Views

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAREN BOWYER JUST WAR DOCTRINE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the rules of war, beginning with the Religious Peace of Augsburg (1555) and continuing<br />

through the Peace of Westphalia (1638) to the development of early international law by<br />

the likes of Grotius, Pufendorf and Vattel (see Section 1.2.3 ), can be seen as a reaction<br />

to the increasing cost of war (in human and financial terms) made particularly apparent<br />

by the 30 Years War. Warfare in the 17 th and 18 th Century became, then, something of<br />

a well-regulated stately dance between organised forces, by-and-large disciplined and<br />

well ordered and, again by-and-large, avoiding to a great extent any impact on the<br />

civilian population. Standing armies were simply too costly to be lost in wholesale<br />

slaughter. The advent of the levee-en-mass and the beginnings of total war following<br />

the French Revolution changed this again. To a greater extent than ever before nations<br />

and not just their armies were at war.<br />

The 19 th and 20 th Centuries saw both an increasing involvement of the civilian<br />

population in the conduct and effect of war and, through war’s industrialization, an ever<br />

expanding capacity for destruction. Even so, it is possible to find examples of those<br />

who sought, ultimately without success, to hold back this tide of change. JFC Fuller 95<br />

draws attention to French Marshal Gerard’s 1832 assault on Antwerp. Dutch General<br />

Chasse, commanding the defenders in the citadel, agreed to train his guns only on the<br />

open plains if Gerard would agree (as he did) only to approach from that direction, thus<br />

sparing the citizens and property of Antwerp. At the same time Western armies<br />

transformed themselves with military service becoming increasingly professional.<br />

These changes at once demanded the development of internationally recognized<br />

restraints on the conduct of war – to mitigate the scale of slaughter made possible by<br />

industrialization and to limit the effects on the civil populace – and saw the replacement<br />

of chivalric-based honour codes amongst the predominantly aristocratic officer classes,<br />

with the ethos and codes of conduct of a ‘profession’ of arms. 96<br />

The 20th Century, as was shown in Chapter 1, saw increasingly strident attempts to<br />

curtail warfare altogether as an instrument of international policy, and the culmination<br />

of such attempts in the UN Charter, together with the re-formulation of the Geneva<br />

Conventions in 1949, largely rendered obsolete discussion of jus in bello insofar as the<br />

conduct of individual soldiers was concerned. There had been established, after all, a<br />

280

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!