22.06.2013 Views

Grammatically Correct: The writer's essential guide to punctuation ...

Grammatically Correct: The writer's essential guide to punctuation ...

Grammatically Correct: The writer's essential guide to punctuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT<br />

<strong>The</strong> next witness testified that she had been fired from her job as a line<br />

supervisor. Her offense: trying <strong>to</strong> organize the fac<strong>to</strong>ry's 200 workers,<br />

who earned an average of $90 a week.<br />

<strong>The</strong> text in both cases is basically the same, but the message<br />

is subtly different. A contrast exists between the reference <strong>to</strong> an<br />

"offense," which implies some inappropriate behavior, and the actual<br />

actions of the subject, which seem <strong>to</strong> be laudable. Assuming the<br />

writer is trying <strong>to</strong> portray the subject's actions in a sympathetic or<br />

supportive light, version B achieves this better. In version A, a reader<br />

who wasn't paying close attention might get the impression that the<br />

writer as well as the fac<strong>to</strong>ry owners viewed these actions as a genuine<br />

offense. In version B, the colon heightens the contrast, thereby<br />

making it clear that the word offense is being used ironically.<br />

Consider the two versions of the next example:<br />

Wife assault cannot be dismissed as merely a symp<strong>to</strong>m of marital<br />

problems. It is a criminal activity that is a manifestation of the abuser's<br />

inability <strong>to</strong> deal with frustration and anger.<br />

Wife assault cannot be dismissed as merely a symp<strong>to</strong>m of marital<br />

problems: It is a criminal activity that is a manifestation of the abuser's<br />

inability <strong>to</strong> deal with frustration and anger.<br />

Here, version A has less impact than version B, since the contrast<br />

between the key words-the relatively benign "marital problems"<br />

versus "criminal activity"-is diminished by putting them in separate<br />

sentences.<br />

If the goal is <strong>to</strong> run these two sentences <strong>to</strong>gether, would not a<br />

semicolon or a dash do as well? <strong>The</strong> answer is no, for somewhat<br />

subtle reasons. <strong>The</strong> first part of this sentence is acting as a "buildup"<br />

<strong>to</strong> the second, in that it tells the reader what wife assault is not.<br />

<strong>The</strong> colon then conveys the message that the remainder of the<br />

sentence will set you straight as <strong>to</strong> what it is. (Put in the terms<br />

given earlier, the implied question is, Well, if wife assault isn't a<br />

marital problem, what is it?, and the answer is, A criminal activity.)<br />

Neither the semicolon nor the dash quite performs this function.<br />

<strong>The</strong> semicolon does not act <strong>to</strong> draw the reader's attention <strong>to</strong> what<br />

follows it, and while the dash does, it does so for purposes other<br />

than answering a "question" raised in the first part.<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!