22.06.2013 Views

Grammatically Correct: The writer's essential guide to punctuation ...

Grammatically Correct: The writer's essential guide to punctuation ...

Grammatically Correct: The writer's essential guide to punctuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT<br />

said. It's an old term-paper trick that didn't fool your profs then,<br />

and won't fool your readers now.)<br />

<strong>The</strong> following passages present some illustrations of needless<br />

repetition:<br />

EXAMPLE 1<br />

In our survey of pediatricians, nearly all our respondents indicated that<br />

their clinical activities should include both diagnosis and subsequent<br />

follow-up of child abuse cases. Over 97 percent of those returning the<br />

survey said that they believed that they should be detecting and treating<br />

this problem.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second sentence adds little here. <strong>The</strong> terms detecting and<br />

treating are really just restatements of diagnosing and following<br />

up (or ifthereis a distinction, it's a pretty fine one), and respondents<br />

are obviously the same people as those returning the survey. <strong>The</strong><br />

only actual addition is a specification of what was meant by nearly<br />

all, and this information is easily incorporated in<strong>to</strong> the first sentence.<br />

BETTER: In our survey of pediatricians, nearly all our respondents (over<br />

97 percent) indicated that their clinical activities should include both<br />

diagnosis and subsequent follow-up of child abuse cases.<br />

EXAMPLE 2<br />

<strong>The</strong> validity of a test that measures coping traits is restricted <strong>to</strong> the<br />

population for which the test was designed. A measure that is valid when<br />

administered <strong>to</strong> one type of population may not be valid for another,<br />

and there are no standardized tests in this field that are appropriate in<br />

all situations. It is not possible <strong>to</strong> develop or refine a test for measuring<br />

coping traits that can meet all requirements and perform well in all<br />

circumstances. <strong>The</strong>refore, researchers must be careful <strong>to</strong> select a test that<br />

is appropriate for their specific situation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second-<strong>to</strong>-last sentence here merely restates what is already<br />

clear, so the passage does not lose any information if this sentence<br />

is deleted.<br />

314<br />

BETTER: <strong>The</strong> validity of a test that measures coping traits is restricted <strong>to</strong><br />

the population for which the test was designed. A measure that is valid<br />

when administered <strong>to</strong> one type of population may not be valid for another,<br />

and there are no standardized tests in this field that are appropriate in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!