22.06.2013 Views

Grammatically Correct: The writer's essential guide to punctuation ...

Grammatically Correct: The writer's essential guide to punctuation ...

Grammatically Correct: The writer's essential guide to punctuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PUNCTUATION<br />

Ensure that the power switch which is on the left side of the panel is<br />

turned on.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se sentences present a conflict. In the first, the word which<br />

implies that the clause which were heavily water-damaged is<br />

nonrestrictive, meaning that all the prints were damaged-but the<br />

absence of commas implies that it is restrictive, and that only<br />

certain prints were damaged. In the second, the use of which<br />

implies that there is only one switch and it happens <strong>to</strong> be on the<br />

left side-but the absence of commas implies that of the various<br />

switches, the one on the left is the one that should be turned on.<br />

<strong>The</strong> result in both cases is ambiguity, which can be resolved only<br />

if the text contains prior information that clarifies which possibility<br />

is intended. In the absence of such information, it is not clear if<br />

the writer erred in using which for that, or in omitting the commas.<br />

Remember the general rule: Which takes a comma, that does not.<br />

A final comment on the which/that rule: It is a North American<br />

convention, not a universal one. British writers will happily use<br />

which for restrictive clauses, and indeed in most cases the meaning<br />

is clear. Disregarding the distinction is not a problem as long as<br />

you know <strong>to</strong> avoid constructions that may be misconstrued.<br />

SEPARATING ELEMENTS IN A SERIES<br />

What's the difference between the following two sentences?<br />

<strong>The</strong> only ones <strong>to</strong> show up were Monica and Bram, Sally, Bruce and<br />

Penelope, Arthur and Ethel, and Humphrey.<br />

<strong>The</strong> only ones <strong>to</strong> show up were Monica and Bram, Sally, Bruce and<br />

Penelope, Arthur, and Ethel and Humphrey.<br />

In case A, Arthur and Ethel came as a couple; Humphrey is odd<br />

man out. In case B, the couple are Ethel and Humphrey, with Arthur<br />

on his own. If there were no commas <strong>to</strong> show where the breaks<br />

between elements occur, the sentence could be interpreted either<br />

way.<br />

Whenever you construct a sentence that contains a list of elements<br />

of equal grammatical weight, you must use commas <strong>to</strong> separate<br />

them. <strong>The</strong> elements can range from single words <strong>to</strong> phrases and<br />

clauses.<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!