22.06.2013 Views

Grammatically Correct: The writer's essential guide to punctuation ...

Grammatically Correct: The writer's essential guide to punctuation ...

Grammatically Correct: The writer's essential guide to punctuation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT<br />

waiters had <strong>to</strong> carry in the wedding cake, because the cake, not<br />

the waiters, is the focus of the sentence.<br />

Often, the decision as <strong>to</strong> which voice is more appropriate can be<br />

made only by considering the larger context. Thus, you would say<br />

Very young babies prefer black-and-white images if you are writing<br />

about how babies of various ages respond <strong>to</strong> colors; however, if<br />

your focus is on the colors themselves, it would be better <strong>to</strong> word<br />

this information as Black-and-white images are preferred by very<br />

young babies. That is, neither form is inherently better: <strong>The</strong> purpose<br />

and context of your writing should determine which voice is<br />

used.<br />

• When the doer can be inferred or is not of interest.<br />

It would be better <strong>to</strong> say <strong>The</strong> cake wasn't served until two in<br />

the morning rather than <strong>The</strong> waiters didn't serve the cake until<br />

two in the morning, if (a) it can be inferred that the waiters did<br />

the serving and (b) it doesn't matter anyway, and using the active<br />

voice would put an inappropriate emphasis on the wrong part of<br />

the sentence. If there were some relevance <strong>to</strong> who served the cake,<br />

that would be different: For example, <strong>The</strong> bride herself served the<br />

cake, and the groom handed out the forks.<br />

• To avoid using the first-person-singular pronoun.<br />

In academic writing, it is conventional <strong>to</strong> avoid saying I when<br />

referring <strong>to</strong> one's own work (although we is generally acceptable).<br />

<strong>The</strong> usual strategy is <strong>to</strong> word things in the passive voice: Tilus, instead<br />

of I randomly assigned the subjects <strong>to</strong> each group, saying Subjects<br />

were randomly assigned <strong>to</strong> each group. Here again, the focus of<br />

the writing is on what is being done, not on who is doing it.<br />

• To avoid using all-male pronouns.<br />

Many writers prefer not <strong>to</strong> refer <strong>to</strong> a generic individual of unspecified<br />

sex exclusively as he. <strong>The</strong> problem is, there is no pronoun in<br />

English that can be used <strong>to</strong> indicate a single person of either sex,<br />

so more inventive strategies are needed. One approach is <strong>to</strong> word<br />

sentences in the passive voice <strong>to</strong> avoid the need for pronouns<br />

al<strong>to</strong>gether. For example, instead of saying <strong>The</strong> average driver<br />

trades in his car every jour years, you could say <strong>The</strong> average<br />

288

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!