16.07.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

113<br />

Chapter 3 Research Framework<br />

qualitative researcher systematically watches people and events to find out about<br />

behaviours and interactions in natural settings. Yin (2009) stated that the case study<br />

approach, which requires the research to take place in its natural setting, creates an<br />

ideal opportunity for observations to be used as a data collection tool.<br />

Burns and Grove (2001) discussed the level <strong>of</strong> structure to observing and explained<br />

the key differences between unstructured observations and structured observations.<br />

Unstructured observations involve spontaneously observing and recording what is<br />

seen with a minimum <strong>of</strong> prior planning, while structured observation defines<br />

carefully what is to be observed. Structured observations may use category systems<br />

whereby only the behaviour that is <strong>of</strong> interest is recorded. Burns and Grove (2001)<br />

stated that this approach can prove challenging for the researcher as they need to<br />

make decisions about what observations belong to which categories. Casey (2006)<br />

summarises from other researchers that the degree <strong>of</strong> structure may be described as<br />

molar or molecular. Molar categories are broad based and used when the category is<br />

not well defined, and molecular is used when the categories are detailed and precise<br />

(Casey, 2006). Another approach is the checklist approach, which uses techniques to<br />

indicate whether or not a behaviour has occurred. This requires the researcher to<br />

have a clear idea about what they are looking for in their observations.<br />

Casey (2006) stated that observational data need to obtain a representative example<br />

<strong>of</strong> the phenomenon being examined. For example, if the researcher wishes to look at<br />

the approach to caregiving during a morning shift then they will need to observe the<br />

morning shift over a period <strong>of</strong> several days in order to observe if staff determine the<br />

routine or if the routine exists regardless <strong>of</strong> what staff are on duty. The observer may<br />

choose to use time or event sampling in order to observe this phenomenon. Time<br />

sampling observes for a certain time period and this may be randomly or<br />

systematically chosen, whereas event sampling observes a particular event or<br />

interaction (Casey, 2006). Casey (2006) advised that in determining the observation<br />

period the researcher must choose a long enough period in order to capture what is<br />

happening, but a short enough period in order to prevent observer exhaustion. She<br />

thus advised from her work that a maximum <strong>of</strong> two-hour observation periods at any<br />

one time is sufficient. Further to these decisions, the researcher must also consider<br />

what position they will take up in order to observe. The options include multiple

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!