16.07.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.1 Introduction<br />

3. Research Framework<br />

74<br />

Chapter 3 Research Framework<br />

This chapter will discuss the various research paradigms and research<br />

methodologies/strategies used in healthcare research. Subsequently the rationales for<br />

choosing a pragmatic paradigm and a phase one case study and phase two action<br />

research approach will be presented. This chapter will then explore the data<br />

collection methods and data analysis options available to the researcher. Issues<br />

around maintaining research rigour will then be addressed. The chapter will conclude<br />

with a discussion <strong>of</strong> the ethical responsibilities inherent in conducting research.<br />

3.2 Research Paradigms<br />

Paradigms are sets <strong>of</strong> practices and beliefs. They categorise inquiry within<br />

disciplines. They are characterised by ontological, epistemological and<br />

methodological differences in their approach to research and contribution to<br />

knowledge. According to Denzin and Lincoln (1994), “ontology” describes what is<br />

the real world and what can be known about it, “epistemology” describes what is the<br />

relationship between the knower and what can be known, and “methodology”<br />

describes how the inquirer can go about finding out whatever he or she believes can<br />

be known. Thus the researcher’s ontology directs the epistemology and subsequently<br />

the methodology. Therefore the paradigm provides a framework or a lens in order to<br />

accomplish an investigation. A paradigm may also be referred to as a “disciplinary<br />

matrix”, “research tradition” or “worldview” (Allen et al., 1986).<br />

Weaver and Olson (2006) suggested that there is no one paradigm superior to<br />

another. Rather, different paradigms can inform different aspects vital to nursing<br />

practice and that the choice <strong>of</strong> the research paradigm is <strong>of</strong>ten guided by the current<br />

state <strong>of</strong> knowledge about a particular area <strong>of</strong> nursing. The literature revealed that<br />

there are many paradigms recognised for nursing research but no apparent consensus<br />

on these (Creswell, 2009; Weaver and Olson, 2006; Denzin and Lincoln, 1994).<br />

Denzin and Lincoln (1994) outlined six main paradigms: constructionism,<br />

interpretivism, feminism, positivism, post-positivism and critical theory. Creswell<br />

(2009) outlined four main paradigms: post-positivism, participatory/advocacy, social

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!