16.07.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

236<br />

Chapter 6 Phase Two<br />

Reflection Excerpt no.1<br />

Phase two <strong>of</strong> this research study is a change initiative guided by action research<br />

principles and when it came to writing up this phase <strong>of</strong> the research I didn’t<br />

really know where to start. It didn’t fit into the same structure used for phase 1.<br />

The literature review and methodology had already been discussed but now I<br />

needed to write a “method” section, a “findings” section and a “discussion”<br />

section for phase 2. This immediately presented a challenge because the method,<br />

findings and discussion were inter-related and one informed the other in the AR<br />

cycle <strong>of</strong> action, reflection, evaluation, action, reflection, evaluation.<br />

Furthermore, elements <strong>of</strong> discussion were also emerging in the reflections and in<br />

the evaluations <strong>of</strong> each step in this phase <strong>of</strong> the research. McNiff, Lomax and<br />

Whitehead (2003) advise that the challenge for action researchers lies in<br />

presenting their work in a form that is going to serve their particular purpose as<br />

well as represent their work authentically. Perry and Zuber-Skerritt (1992)<br />

suggest considering the thesis for action research as separate to the action<br />

research project i.e. the thesis project uses data from the action research project.<br />

McNiff, Lomax and Whitehead (2003) explain that traditional research<br />

methodologies follow linear forms <strong>of</strong> thinking but that new scholarships such as<br />

AR tend to use non-traditional ways <strong>of</strong> thinking or non-linear forms <strong>of</strong> reporting.<br />

They add that the aim <strong>of</strong> this non-traditional approach is to show how processes<br />

<strong>of</strong> enquiry lead to improved practices. They suggest that the best way to do this is<br />

creatively and using non-linear approaches. For action research theses, McNiff,<br />

Lomax and Whitehead (2003) suggest using diary excerpts, representing<br />

dialogue, telling stories, using poetry or personal pronouns, using multimedia or<br />

adopting the patchwork approach. The patchwork approach enables the<br />

researcher to present a traditional report in conjunction with a creative report. I<br />

felt that this approach along with writing in the first person would help me to<br />

both organise the data and report on the research. I decided to write a thesis<br />

report detailing the steps involved in the change initiative guided by AR<br />

principles and to support this with my reflective journal abstracts which would<br />

specify the learning which took place along the journey.<br />

6.1.2 Study Sample<br />

The same group <strong>of</strong> residents, staff and residents family members who had been<br />

involved in phase 1 agreed to participate in phase 2.<br />

6.1.3 Study Site<br />

The same case study site from phase 1 was the research site for phase 2.<br />

6.1.4 Research Ethics<br />

Ethical approval previously obtained for phase 1 was approved for extension into<br />

phase 2 and informed consent was obtained verbally from all participants. As in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!