16.07.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

179<br />

Chapter 5 Findings<br />

The analysis revealed that 40% <strong>of</strong> notes (n=15) had documented evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

residents being self-governing, self-ruling and self-determining (Chart 5.9) and<br />

60% (n=23) <strong>of</strong> sets <strong>of</strong> documentation showed no evidence <strong>of</strong> this element <strong>of</strong><br />

resident autonomy.<br />

Chart 5.9: Element 1<br />

Self-governing, self-ruling, self-determining<br />

40%<br />

While some residents clearly exercised choice and control over how they spent<br />

their day, these were largely choices in relation to personal care (whether to get<br />

up or stay in bed, have a shower or bed bath, etc.) and not how they wished to<br />

socially/recreationally spend their day.<br />

“Shower refused. Mobilising around the ward independently.”<br />

“Did not wish to get out <strong>of</strong> bed today. Remained in bed.”<br />

However, in the example below it is not clear from the documentation whether or<br />

not the resident was actually <strong>of</strong>fered a choice about having a shower:<br />

“Personal Hygiene attended to: shower given, hair washed and blow<br />

dried.”<br />

In the following example, the resident’s ability to self-determine was enabled:<br />

60%<br />

Evident<br />

Not Evident

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!