16.07.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Theme 1: The Personal<br />

191<br />

Chapter 5 Findings<br />

This theme generated from the findings describes autonomy in many domains.<br />

“Personal” is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as “belonging to or<br />

affecting a particular person rather than anyone else.” The analysis <strong>of</strong> the data<br />

revealed that this theme consisted <strong>of</strong> three sub-themes: The Person, The<br />

Personality and Person to Person. These will be described individually.<br />

Sub-theme 1a: The Person: “You are being so hands on for them and there<br />

was no need”<br />

There are many “persons” in residential care. These include residents, staff and<br />

family persons. The resident person’s capacity was considered to be a factor in<br />

whether or not they experienced autonomy, and it was suggested that capacity is<br />

enhanced when it is encouraged and maintained by staff persons. Staff spoke<br />

about the need to know the residents’ abilities and about the difficulties they<br />

experience in negotiating and sharing control with residents. Staff talked a lot<br />

about a person’s independence and dependence in relation to their capacity, and<br />

residents spoke about relying on staff to help them. Staff participants talked<br />

about trying to encourage resident capacity by not doing things for residents that<br />

they can do for themselves, whilst some resident participants expressed a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

confidence in their own abilities. This sub-theme is complex as it describes how<br />

a resident person’s capacity is <strong>of</strong>ten diminished or not encouraged, even though<br />

this negates their personal human rights, i.e. the right to self-determination and<br />

the right to make decisions. While staff were aware <strong>of</strong> these rights they also<br />

struggled with facilitating them, e.g. providing choice.<br />

Staff participants described residents’ abilities/capacity and their desire to<br />

encourage them to maintain their abilities:<br />

“If they can function at all, to promote whatever functions they<br />

have”<br />

(S13)<br />

“I always say we’re here to encourage independence not<br />

dependence”<br />

(S14)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!