16.07.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

126<br />

Chapter 3 Research Framework<br />

Begley, 1996). Four main approaches are identified: data, investigator, theoretical<br />

and methodological. Data triangulation involves using multiple sources <strong>of</strong> data, all<br />

with a similar focus (Polit and Beck, 2006). Within this approach the researcher may<br />

choose time, space or person triangulation. Time triangulation involves collecting<br />

data about the same phenomenon at different time intervals, space triangulation<br />

involves collecting data from multiple sites, and person triangulation involves<br />

collecting data from any pair <strong>of</strong> the three levels <strong>of</strong> persons - these may be<br />

individuals, groups or collectives (Begley, 1996). Investigator triangulation involves<br />

two or more skilled researchers examining the data (Begley, 1996). Theoretical<br />

triangulation involves developing competing hypotheses from different theoretical<br />

backgrounds, which are then tested against each other with the purpose <strong>of</strong> generating<br />

or testing theory (Begley, 1996). Finally, methodological triangulation involves<br />

using two or more research methods.<br />

Many authors have discussed the advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> triangulation in<br />

nursing research (Briller et al., 2008; Casey and Murphy, 2009; Redfern and<br />

Norman, 1994; Silverman, 2001). Redfern and Norman (1994) state that<br />

triangulation is ideal if one is investigating complex social issues and seeking to<br />

provide rich explanations <strong>of</strong> phenomena. They state that the advantages include<br />

achieving completeness from the research, achieving confidence in the research<br />

results, and confirmation that the data collection tools are valid and that overall it can<br />

overcome the bias inherent in using one single method. Redfern and Norman (1994)<br />

also acknowledge that the disadvantages <strong>of</strong> triangulated research studies include the<br />

high costs associated with using multiple methods <strong>of</strong> data collection and the<br />

potential for error in the use <strong>of</strong> any one <strong>of</strong> the methods. Begley (1996) argued that<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the highlighted disadvantages may in fact be limitations <strong>of</strong> any type <strong>of</strong><br />

research, and are not specifically related to triangulation. Begley (1996) further<br />

explained that the researcher choosing triangulation must choose it for the correct<br />

reasons and give an adequate rationale and adequate description <strong>of</strong> the planning and<br />

method employed. Finally, Speziale and Carpenter (2003) suggested that<br />

triangulation is particularly suited to nursing research due to the complexity <strong>of</strong><br />

nursing phenomena.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!