16.07.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

281<br />

Chapter 7 Discussion<br />

Issues <strong>of</strong> confidentiality were key for the documentary data collection and again<br />

this required sufficient time to be factored in for this stage <strong>of</strong> data collection as<br />

no data could be removed from the case study site with any identifiable<br />

information on it. All <strong>of</strong> the residents sets <strong>of</strong> documentation were photocopied on<br />

site and all information which identified them was erased prior to the documents<br />

leaving the case study site.<br />

7.5.4 Issues related to validity <strong>of</strong> data collection tools<br />

It was the first time for these interview, observation and documentary data<br />

collection tools to be used in a research study however all <strong>of</strong> the data collection<br />

tools were designed from the literature and subsequent concept analysis.<br />

Furthermore all <strong>of</strong> the data collection tools were piloted prior to use in the main<br />

study. Future research studies may contribute to the validation <strong>of</strong> these data<br />

collection tools. The KAOP as a data collection tool has recently been re-<br />

affirmed by Doherty et al, (2011) and its reliability has been found to be alpha<br />

0.79 (Lambrinou et al, 2005).<br />

7.6 Conclusions<br />

To conclude the chapter and thesis, the following are suggested as directions for<br />

future work.<br />

7.6.1 Future Research Directions<br />

Hollander and Kane (2003) suggest that research can improve practice in<br />

residential care. They suggest that research can contribute in four ways: 1) By<br />

developing new concepts and methods that help define fundamental goals, 2) By<br />

designing practical tools that document the nature and magnitude <strong>of</strong> problems to<br />

be addressed and the outcomes that are achieved, 3) By assessing interventions<br />

and strategies for improving care and finally 4) By evaluating new models,<br />

programs, or systems <strong>of</strong> service delivery. While this research was the first to<br />

specifically explore autonomy for older people in residential care in <strong>Ireland</strong>,<br />

phase two only focused on enhancing one small element <strong>of</strong> autonomy. Therefore,<br />

now that there are attributes <strong>of</strong> resident autonomy identified, future research<br />

could focus on ways in which resident autonomy can be further enhanced.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!