16.07.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.7.3 Adding Rigour to the Documentary Analysis Tool<br />

138<br />

Chapter 4 Research Method<br />

A random sample <strong>of</strong> 10 sets <strong>of</strong> documentation were analysed by another researcher<br />

in order to ensure consistency and thus contribute to the reliability <strong>of</strong> the findings.<br />

Table 4.1 outlines the criteria used to recruit the second researcher for this process:<br />

Table 4.1: Criteria for the second researcher for the documentary audit tool<br />

consistency check<br />

Criteria Rationale<br />

Must be a registered nurse. Will understand the nursing process<br />

(assessing, planning, implementing,<br />

documenting, evaluating) and An Bord<br />

Altranais requirements for<br />

documentation.<br />

Must have knowledge <strong>of</strong> older people’s Will understand the context, e.g.<br />

services.<br />

Must have understanding <strong>of</strong> the culture<br />

and climate <strong>of</strong> residential care for older<br />

people.<br />

May be employed in nurse education or<br />

practice development.<br />

Must have previous experience <strong>of</strong><br />

conducting research or assisting in a<br />

research project.<br />

residential standards.<br />

Will recognise that approaches to<br />

residential care are different from acute<br />

care.<br />

Will be familiar with all <strong>of</strong> the above.<br />

In order to appreciate and understand the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> rigorous, systematic<br />

approaches.<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the sample <strong>of</strong> 10 sets <strong>of</strong> documentation by two researchers ensured<br />

that the tool could be applied consistently and reliably. The tool was amended when<br />

any <strong>of</strong> the criteria had been interpreted differently. There was 95% consistency<br />

between the researchers. The two researchers found that “ethos <strong>of</strong> maintaining<br />

dignity” was not always possible to examine fully in documentation and this<br />

accounted for the lack <strong>of</strong> consistency in auditing 5% <strong>of</strong> the documentation. It was<br />

agreed that this could be further explored during the observations.<br />

4.7.4 Staff Rosters<br />

Copies <strong>of</strong> staff rosters were collected over a four-month period. The interviews were<br />

conducted over a three-month period with an additional month (four months’ data<br />

collection in total) for recruitment, and it was during this time that staff rosters were<br />

collected. Hence the staff rosters were collected simultaneous to the interviews. Daily<br />

allocation sheets from the duty roster were photocopied and these displayed how<br />

many staff were on duty, whether or not anyone was on sick leave, and whether or not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!