16.07.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

31<br />

Chapter 2: Literature Review<br />

Hence power is perhaps a related term, but also integral to autonomy. Power has<br />

been discussed for many years and many theories <strong>of</strong> power have been presented.<br />

Dahl (1961) presented his theory <strong>of</strong> “community power”, which he explained as<br />

power being exercised in a community by a particular concrete individual, while<br />

other individuals are prevented from doing what they prefer to do. Power is<br />

exercised in order to cause those who are subject to it to follow the private<br />

preferences <strong>of</strong> those who possess the power. Power is the production <strong>of</strong> obedience.<br />

Gaventa (1980) examined power in the decision-making process. Gaventa’s (1980)<br />

model <strong>of</strong> power suggested that if there is a shift in the power relations then a<br />

challenge occurs: there must be a loss <strong>of</strong> power by A or a gain <strong>of</strong> power by B for a<br />

change to occur, and B must take some steps to overcome his powerlessness. A can<br />

interfere with B’s plans, can interfere with B obtaining resources and developing<br />

abilities, and can incite against the opening up <strong>of</strong> issues. Foucault (1980) assumed<br />

that a power/knowledge connection cannot be separated. Foucault (1980) described<br />

disciplinary power, which he stated affects most social institutions and leads to a<br />

psychic punishment <strong>of</strong> the soul. He stated that power relations are dependent on<br />

culture, place and time.<br />

Giddens (1984) constructed the inclusive social theory called “structuration” or<br />

“duality <strong>of</strong> structure”. He stated that power is exercised by human agents and is also<br />

created by them, influences them and limits them. Giddens (1984) stated that<br />

absolute lack <strong>of</strong> power means ceasing to be a human agent and therefore it is always<br />

part <strong>of</strong> relations. Giddens (1984) stated that power can be described on a continuum<br />

<strong>of</strong> autonomy and dependence. Unequal access to resources for realising goals and<br />

unequal opportunities to influence the course <strong>of</strong> the interaction ensure mutual<br />

relations, because each side is to a certain extent dependent on the other, and also<br />

autonomous to a certain extent in its action. The investigation <strong>of</strong> power involves<br />

exposing the dialectics <strong>of</strong> dependence and autonomy in specific situations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!