16.07.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

122<br />

Chapter 3 Research Framework<br />

Yin (2009) stated that no matter which analytical strategy is chosen, the researcher<br />

must do everything to make sure that the analysis is <strong>of</strong> the highest quality. The next<br />

section will first outline rigour in relation to qualitative research.This will be<br />

followed by an outline <strong>of</strong> rigour in relation to quantitative research.<br />

3.10.1 Rigour in Qualitative Research<br />

According to Parahoo (2006), all research involves the systematic and rigourous<br />

collection and analysis <strong>of</strong> data, and qualitative research is no exception. Rigour in<br />

research is defined as thoroughness and competence (Holloway and Wheeler, 2010).<br />

Speziale and Carpenter (2003) acknowledge that much debate has taken place in the<br />

literature about how qualitative researchers can demonstrate rigour or goodness in<br />

their research. The ultimate goal is to accurately represent research participants’<br />

experiences (Speziale and Carpenter, 2003). This includes ensuring that the research<br />

is credible, which means that researcher subjectivity has been acknowledged,<br />

multiple realities have been recognised, and reports <strong>of</strong> the perspectives <strong>of</strong><br />

participants are as clear as possible.<br />

Several researchers have outlined the criteria necessary for qualitative research to<br />

demonstrate its quality (Burns and Grove, 2010; Holloway and Wheller, 2010;<br />

Lincoln and Guba, 1985; Patton, 2002; Speziale and Carpenter, 2003). Holloway<br />

and Wheller (2010) discuss what they call the “traditional” criteria established by<br />

Lincoln and Guba (1985). These criteria (Table 3.1) are considered the “gold<br />

standard” and are referred to as rigour in quantitative research or trustworthiness in<br />

qualitative research, reliability in quantitative research or dependability in qualitative<br />

research, validity in quantitative research or credibility in qualitative research,<br />

generalisability in quantitative research or transferability in qualitative research, and<br />

objectivity in quantitative research or confirmability in qualitative research.<br />

Confirmability is achieved by providing an audit trail, the object <strong>of</strong> which is to<br />

illustrate as clearly as possible that all <strong>of</strong> the evidence has been attended to and that<br />

the thought processes throughout the research led to accurate conclusions.<br />

Dependability <strong>of</strong> the research asks how dependable is the research? It is closely<br />

linked to credibility. Finally, transferability refers to the potential <strong>of</strong> the research to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!