16.07.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

270<br />

Chapter 7 Discussion<br />

possessions rather than to a “homely” atmosphere. This may account for why<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the residents personalised their bed spaces with their personal<br />

possessions. Cook (2010) adds that personalised objects can be useful aids for<br />

communicating with residents with cognitive impairment. The concept analysis<br />

revealed that a homely atmosphere is a consequence <strong>of</strong> resident autonomy.<br />

The documentary analysis revealed that the majority <strong>of</strong> the residents did not have<br />

a personalised care plan even though Davies, Laker and Ellis (1997) have<br />

suggested that individualised assessment and care planning underpins the<br />

realisation <strong>of</strong> autonomy.The interviews and observations revealed that a<br />

resident’s autonomy can be affected by the level <strong>of</strong> personalised daily life they<br />

experience. In other words, how the resident spends their day and whether or not<br />

it is according to their wishes and hobbies. All participants felt that the residents<br />

were not experiencing enough meaningful activity and that this was prohibiting<br />

their autonomy. Cook (2010) refers to the “social death” in residential care<br />

whereby meaningful activity for the resident is not facilitated. The observations<br />

revealed long periods during the day when nothing really happened for the<br />

residents. Staff expressed their dismay at not being able to take residents out or<br />

to do activities with them due to time constraints. Residents expressed apathy<br />

and loss at no longer being able to do the things they enjoyed doing at home.<br />

Similarly, Armstrong-Esther et al. (1989) observed in their study that staff did<br />

not engage in any social activities with residents at any time and Erlander,<br />

Drechler and Wallin Pearson (1993) found that residents may have little choice<br />

over daily activities that are <strong>of</strong> importance to them unless the staff attach a<br />

similar degree <strong>of</strong> importance to a particular activity. An emergent theme from<br />

this study was also about recreational activity and its importance for resident<br />

autonomy. H<strong>of</strong>land (1994) added that people with dementia also require age<br />

appropriate activities. Higgs et al. (1998) found that respondents felt isolated or<br />

lonely and felt that they had nothing to do all day but sit around. This study<br />

affirmed this and one resident commented that every day is the same.<br />

Nolan et al. (1995) found that many patients continue to spend most <strong>of</strong> their time<br />

inactive. They further add that nurses do not perceive providing activity as a<br />

legitimate part <strong>of</strong> their role. Observations from this study would support this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!